Is there a way to label a \footnotemark
instance (without redefining the \footnotemark
macro)? Labeling the \footnotemark
has no effect (it labels whatever environment the command is invoked from) and labeling its corresponding \footnotetext
is not guaranteed to produce the correct number (it merely returns the current value of the default footnote counter). See below:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[colorlinks=true,urlcolor=red,hyperfootnotes=false]{hyperref}
\begin{document}
This text is footnoted\footnotemark\label{fnm:1} \footnotemark\label{fnm:2}
\footnotetext{Footnote `1'\label{fnt:1}.}%
\footnotetext{Footnote `2'\label{fnt:2}.}%
The numbers of the labels: %
\{\ref{fnm:1}, \ref{fnt:1}, \ref{fnm:2}, \ref{fnt:2}\}
The sequence should read: \{1, 1, 2, 2\}
\end{document}
Output:
Labeling a \footnote
is trivial as one can simply call the \label
command from within the footnote environment. However, LaTeX does not appear to support labeling of a \footnotemark
. Please advise if there is an efficient solution to label a \footnotemark
. Thank you.
Best Answer
\footnotemark
executes\stepcounter{footnote}
by default, which does not allow proper referencing. If you want to label a footnote, you need to use\refstepcounter{footnote}
. As such, you would need to patch\footnotemark
or do other trickery in order to obtain the correct result.\footnotetext
on the other hand, has no counter associated with it and therefore cannot be referenced in the same way.In order to adequately reference a
\footnotetext
with the same marker as some\footnotemark
, you need to be able to pass an expandable reference of that marker to the specific\footnotetext
's optional argument. This is the technique that causeshyperref
incompatibility in Nested footnotes.