Jagath already mention a solution in his comment:
Can we achieve this using PDF layers? A combination of non-printable and printable layer?
Heres the corresponding MWE:
\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage{ocg-p}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
text
\begin{ocg}[printocg=never]{Notprinted}{noprint}{1}
This paragraph is never printed
\end{ocg}
Text after non print
\end{document}
I tested it with Sumatra and Acrobat XI.
With the same technique you may also put things on a print, but not on a screen:
\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage{ocg-p}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
test
\begin{ocg}[printocg=always]{Onlyprint}{onlyprint}{0}
This paragraph is printed, but not shown by default
\end{ocg}
test after
\end{document}
Lets combine it with a coffee stain, an image of a fly ;)
If I run pdfinfo -box
on a PDF file generated by pdftex
, I get the following information:
Creator: TeX
Producer: pdfTeX-1.40.15
CreationDate: Mon Oct 6 16:01:48 2014
ModDate: Mon Oct 6 16:01:48 2014
Tagged: no
Form: none
Pages: 1
Encrypted: no
Page size: 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4) (rotated 0 degrees)
MediaBox: 0.00 0.00 595.28 841.89
CropBox: 0.00 0.00 595.28 841.89
BleedBox: 0.00 0.00 595.28 841.89
TrimBox: 0.00 0.00 595.28 841.89
ArtBox: 0.00 0.00 595.28 841.89
File size: 58874 bytes
Optimized: no
PDF version: 1.5
When I check a PDF exported from TextEdit, I get
Title: ***
Subject:
Keywords:
Author: ***
Creator: TextEdit
Producer: Mac OS X 10.9.2 Quartz PDFContext
CreationDate: Mon Oct 6 14:10:45 2014
ModDate: Mon Oct 6 14:10:45 2014
Tagged: no
Form: none
Pages: 1
Encrypted: no
Page size: 595 x 842 pts (A4) (rotated 0 degrees)
MediaBox: 0.00 0.00 595.00 842.00
CropBox: 0.00 0.00 595.00 842.00
BleedBox: 0.00 0.00 595.00 842.00
TrimBox: 0.00 0.00 595.00 842.00
ArtBox: 0.00 0.00 595.00 842.00
File size: 16393 bytes
Optimized: no
PDF version: 1.3
The only possible problem might be the page width, which is 595.276 in the former case, 595 in the latter.
Now \pdfpagewidth
is set to 597.50787pt
, which corresponds to 595.27559bp
and this explains the shown value of 595.276
. If we convert this into millimeters, we get
597.50787*25.4/72.27 = 209.99999
but converting 595.276bp
to millimeters gives
595.276*25.4/72 = 210.00014
I don't think that a surplus of less than 150nm (nanometers) should trigger a size reduction of 6% “to fit”. Even if 595.28 is used, we have
595.28*25.4/72 = 210.00156
but, again, a surplus of less than 2µm (micrometers) doesn't seem sufficient for pushing Adobe Reader into thinking that the page “doesn't fit”.
The conversion of 595bp
into millimeters is
595*25.4/72 = 209.90278
which is short of 210mm by sligthly more than 0.04%, while 210.00156mm is about 0.001% more than 210mm.
Nothing will convince me that the computations made by Adobe Reader are so accurate that a difference of less than 0.001% forces shrinking.
Best Answer
At the highest level here, you have only two options:
oneside
ortwoside
.memoir
has\cleartorecto
and\cleartoverso
.)If you're going to print on just one side of the paper, use
oneside
If you're going to print on two sides of the paper, use
twoside
Using
twoside
, other options such asopenany
can reduce the number of blank pagesPDFs are pretty awful for screen reading, but if you're going to do that, then use
oneside
, since the layout stays the same 'shape' when you turn from even to odd pages and vice versa.Oh, and if it's not 'you', then ask your audience and offer them both options.