I'm not sure if this is a TeX related question at all or rather a general problem with Adobe reader, or Windows, or printer drivers, or whatever else is involved.
When I create PDF files with pdflatex in A4 paper size and print them to my A4 printer from Adobe reader, there are several options available for "Page scaling", such as "None", "Fit to printable area", and "Shrink to printable area". Since the document and paper size ar both A4, one might expect that all three options result in printout at original size, especially if there is a thick white margin and nothing interferes with technical printing problems at the paper boundary, say. However, the fit/shrink options both cause a scale factor of 94% and one has to be careful to select the "None" option in order to obtain correct output.
Minimal (with respect to pdf content) example:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}
\thispagestyle{empty}
\null
\end{document}
Is there any possibility to set something in my TeX files such that the pdf files produced are "aware" that there is enough white margin and that no 94% scaling is needed? (Alternatively, I might produce page sizes 6% smaller than A4, but would consider that counterproductive and ridiculuous)
Best Answer
If I run
pdfinfo -box
on a PDF file generated bypdftex
, I get the following information:When I check a PDF exported from TextEdit, I get
The only possible problem might be the page width, which is 595.276 in the former case, 595 in the latter.
Now
\pdfpagewidth
is set to597.50787pt
, which corresponds to595.27559bp
and this explains the shown value of595.276
. If we convert this into millimeters, we getbut converting
595.276bp
to millimeters givesI don't think that a surplus of less than 150nm (nanometers) should trigger a size reduction of 6% “to fit”. Even if 595.28 is used, we have
but, again, a surplus of less than 2µm (micrometers) doesn't seem sufficient for pushing Adobe Reader into thinking that the page “doesn't fit”.
The conversion of
595bp
into millimeters iswhich is short of 210mm by sligthly more than 0.04%, while 210.00156mm is about 0.001% more than 210mm.
Nothing will convince me that the computations made by Adobe Reader are so accurate that a difference of less than 0.001% forces shrinking.