I noticed that pdflatex
does not compile the following minimal working example with an eps figure when the additional options are used for the graphics in the \includegraphics
part. Without the additional options everything works fine. I tried compiling the source with latex
command and everything works fine. I read about these engines and concluded that they are essentially the same program invoked with different options. I really wonder why there are problems with pdf output and not with dvi output. As far as I know these two engines should be using the same format, i.e LaTeX.
I also noticed that I did not have to use epstopdf
package. Why is this the case?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphics}
\usepackage{float}
%\usepackage{epstopdf}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[H]
% \includegraphics[width=3.25in,height=3.25in]{trial.eps}
\includegraphics[15,10][34,45]{trial.eps}
\end{figure}
\end{document}
Best Answer
The set of file types allowed for image inclusion depends on the driver or back end being used.
"Traditionally" pdflatex does not allow EPS and latex/dvips do not allow pdf and you would have an error about unknown graphics type.
However pdflatex these days calls eps2pdf in the background to convert an EPS file to pdf so it can be included.
However I get
which means probably that no one has ever tried this with the
graphics
as opposed tographicx
package version.Probably that's a bug, I'll see what I can do, but really there are no advantages to using
graphics
rather thangraphicx
and if you use thegraphicx
version it all works.