I am definitely unfamiliar with both beamer and tikz (do not quite get what the \only are supposed to do) but perhaps this could go in the direction you want:
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{chains}
\newcounter{count}
% helper macro:
\long\def\GobToSemiColon #1;{}
\newcommand\myPicture{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{scope}[start chain = going below]
\ifnum\value{count}<1 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\ifnum\value{count}>3 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\node[draw, rectangle, on chain] {display only when counter is between
1 and 3};
\ifnum\value{count}>-1 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\node[draw, rectangle, on chain] {display only when counter is
negative};
\ifnum\value{count}<100 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\ifnum\value{count}>200 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\node[draw, rectangle, on chain] {display only if counter is between
100 and 200};
\ifnum\value{count}<3 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\ifnum\value{count}>20 \expandafter\GobToSemiColon\fi
\node[draw, circle, on chain] {only when counter is in the range 3 to 20};
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}
\only{\setcounter{count}{-3}\myPicture}
\only{\setcounter{count}{105}\myPicture}
\only{\setcounter{count}{39}\myPicture}
\only{\setcounter{count}{2}\myPicture}
\only{\setcounter{count}{5}\myPicture}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
As is explained in How do I draw shapes inside a tikz node? pics can be used for defining new objects. My main problem using pics is how to place where you want because they aren't nodes and positioning them is not so easy.
Following code shows how to define EDFA block.
EDFA/.pic={
\begin{scope}[scale=.5]
\draw (-1,0) coordinate (in) -- (-1,1) -- (1,0) coordinate (out) -- (-1,-1) -- cycle;
\node[anchor=north,inner sep=2pt] at (0,-1) {$1$};
\end{scope}
In this case, coordinate (-1,0) will act as west anchor and 1,0 as east. Both point will have an special name for further reference. Every pic is placed according its own origin (0,0). You can use Claudio's answer to Anchoring TiKZ pics for better positioning.
As your example was simple, I'd prefer to star with EDFA and place Source and Sink after it.
\documentclass[]{article}
% tikz
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{positioning} %relative positioning
\begin{document}
\tikzset{%
EDFA/.pic={
\begin{scope}[scale=.5]
\draw (-1,0) coordinate (in) -- (-1,1) -- (1,0) coordinate (out) -- (-1,-1) -- cycle;
\node[anchor=north,inner sep=2pt] at (0,-1) {$1$};
\end{scope}
}
}
\begin{tikzpicture}[
block/.style={draw},
]
\draw pic (edfa) {EDFA};
\node[block, left=of edfain] (source) {Source};
\node[block, right= of edfaout] (sink) {Sink};
\draw[->] (source) -- (edfain);
\draw[->] (edfaout) -- (sink);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
I understand that your components are more complex than EDFA because for this particular case an isosceles triangle node with a label will do the work and it can be used as a node and not as a pic:
\documentclass[]{article}
% tikz
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{positioning} %relative positioning
\usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[
block/.style={draw},
edfa/.style={isosceles triangle, minimum width=1cm,
draw, anchor=west, isosceles triangle stretches,
minimum height=1cm, label=-80:#1}
]
\node[block] (source) {Source};
\node[edfa=1, right=of source] (edfa) {};
\node[block, right= of edfa] (sink) {Sink};
\draw[->] (source) -- (edfa);
\draw[->] (edfa) -- (sink);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Best Answer
There is no general way to solve this: the bounding box of each glyph is dictated by the font itself, and TeX can't change anything about it. (TeX works directly with the bounding box of the glyph with no care for where the "ink" is distributed inside [or outside!] that box.)
The problem is the same with TikZ or just normal running text. The only way to solve it is to use manual kerning adjustments or manual shifts, both of which depend on the font and glyph design.
Some semblance of generality can be obtained by using relative units (
emfor widths andexfor heights), but even this isn't totally perfect since glyphs may have different relative sizes/shapes at the different point sizes.An illustrative example, with hairline boxes around the glyphs: