Why produce the align
and the equation
environment different space between the text. And what can I do, that it have the same?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
Long Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
\begin{align}
1+1=2
\end{align}
Again a long text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
\begin{equation}
1+1=2
\end{equation}
Another Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
\end{document}
Best Answer
The calculations are a bit different so they are not always same but the reason why the spacing is so bad in your example is that you should never have a blank line before a display math. The visible space is not (to TeX) a vertical space but a spurious extra paragraph with just an indentation box and parfillskip glue and no text making a blank line in addition to the intended space.
equation
uses two possible spaces\abovedisplayskip
and\abovediplayshortskip
depending on whether there is an overlap between the last row of the previous para and the equation. As far as I recallalign
doesn't do that (as essentially it's always full width internally even if visually smaller) you can stop equation closing up small cases withOr perhaps better if you want all displays to use a consistent AMS style, use
gather
instead ofequation