[Math] Isotrivial family: different definitions

algebraic-geometryfibrationschemes

Let $f:X\to B$ a flat morphism of varieties over an algebraically closed field $k$. If $f$ is flat and with connected fibres we say that $f:X\to B$ is a family over $B$.

In literature you can find two definitions of "isotriviality" that seems to be not equivalent:

  1. (Mainly used when $X$ is a surface and $B$ is a curve). $f:X\to B$ is called isotrivial if the smooth fibres of $f$ are isomorphic.
  2. $f:X\to B$ is called isotrivial if there exists a dense open set $U\subseteq B$ such that $f^{-1}(x)\cong f^{-1}(y)$ for every $x,y\in U$.

Clearly $1)\Rightarrow 2)$ but the converse seems to be false. Am I right?

Best Answer

Yes, 2 is a priori weaker than 1. And it is false in general.

There are examples of flag varieties specializing to smooth projective horospherical varieties; see Pasquier-Perrin

In particular, there exist a smooth projective morphism $X\to B$ with $B$ a smooth affine connected curve, and a closed point $b$ in $B$ such that $X_s \cong X_t$ for all $s,t\in B\setminus \{b\}$. However, $X_s \cong X_b$ if and only if $b=s$.

There are easier examples of this phenomenon, but this is the first one that came to mind.

Related Question