ll*{3}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash\hspace{0pt}}X}
is
ll
two columns of single line left aligned entries, then
*{3}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash\hspace{0pt}}X}
three copies of >{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash\hspace{0pt}}X
each of these is basically an X
column which is p{...}
for an automatically calculated width.
The tokens in the >{...}
are applied to the start of each cell. In this case that is
\RaggedRight\arraybackslash\hspace{0pt}
\RaggedRight
is an improved version of \raggedright
from the ragged2e
package.
\arraybackslash
is defined in tabularx
it redefines \\
to end the table row (which is its normal definitions in tabular, but \ragedright
, \RaggedRight
etc redefine it locally to make a ragged text line end, which is not wanted here.
Starting a paragraph with \hspace{0pt}
is an old trick to put a space before the first word which allows TeX to hyphenate the first word in the paragraph. (TeX's hyphenation algorithm otherwise doesn't consider the first word, which is probably a bug really but TeX is frozen and isn't going to change that behaviour.
It's not clear that there is really an issue to be solved, it is only an issue for tables if you think there is an issue about tables. Most of the points that you raise could also be made about "paragraphs" or "lists", at some point you have to have some structural information as well as words.
It is easy to have an environment that defaults the column spec, consider for example the amsmath matrix
which is more or less just array
with a default supplied preamble of *{20}{c}
so you could define
\newenvironment{mytab}[1][*{50}{c}]{%
\begin{tabular}{#1}}{%
\end{tabular}}
which makes the column specifications optional, defaulting to all centred. Unlike matrices though where a global default is commonly useful, in my experience a global table default is almost never useful, tables usually have varied column types, some textual, some numeric to be aligned on decimal points, etc. However if in a particular document you have a lot of tables all taking the same form you could use a definition as above, replacing *{50}{c}
by say >{\bfseries}l *{2}{D..{3.2}} p{3cm}
if all your tables have a bold left aligned column, two numeric columns and a final column of note paragraphs.
It's hard to guess how you could automate rules in general, If you always want a top and bottom rule you could change your definition to
\newenvironment{mytab}[1][*{50}{c}]{%
\begin{tabular}{#1}\toprule}{%
\\\bottomrule\end{tabular}}
But the position of \midrule
is rather like the position of words and numbers in the table, effectively it's data that must be entered in each case. Perhaps you only want \midrule
after the heading in which case you could use
\newcommand\endhead{\\\midrule}
so your tables would then look like
\begin{mytab}
\hd{type}&\hd{A}&\hd{B}&\hd{Notes}\endhead
zzz&1.2&3.4& zz zz zzzzz\\
zzz&1.2&3.4& zz zz zzzzz\\
\end{tab}
Using a heading command \hd
that could be defined as
\newcommand\hd[1]{%
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\bfseries\begin{tabular}{@{}c@{}}#1\end{tabular}}
To give bold, centred, potentially multi-line table headings. Color could be added to this command as well if you want coloured tables, there is no need for explicit colours in the table.
Best Answer
See, if the following solution works for you:
Addendum To have only three columns (well, I would rather have four):
With four columns is much nicer (to my opinion):