the proof environment works, but the theorem environment doesn't.
I don't know why this doesn't work:
When I put the red box in comment, it all works without any problem, but not sure why, as I can use the order \begin{theorem}...\end{theorem}
The code is:
\documentclass[11pt]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{here}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage[plainpages=false]{hyperref}
\usepackage{longtable}
\oddsidemargin=0.in
\topmargin=-1.5cm
\textheight=23cm
\textwidth=16cm
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic{equation}}
\renewcommand{\thefigure}{\thesubsection.\arabic{equation}}
\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
\newcommand{\boxing}[1]{
\begin{center}
\framebox[\linewidth][c]{\parbox{15.5cm}{{#1}}}
\end{center}}
\begin{document}
\newpage
\begin{proof}
Test 1
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}
Test 2
\end{theorem}
\end{document}
Best Answer
Mostly theorems are not defined by default. As some prefer writing
thm
as the environment name, others prefertheorem
as the environment name.You can use
To create a new
theorem
environment, in this case its number will be dominated by the section number. (Note that this construction also create a new counter calledtheorem
)Often we'd like to have other theorem like constructions sharing the same counter, thus so we get Theorem 1.1, Lemma 1.2 etc.
This can be done using a slightly different syntax
where we here pass the name of the already made counter, thus we do not make a new counter, we'll just use the one we have.
For further details, see the manual for the
amsthm
package.BTW: LaTeX provides
\newtheorem
out of the box, not packages needed. Theamsthm
package just extends it in a convenient way. See also thethmtools
package for an alternative syntax for making theorem like constructions.