I created a table in LaTeX, but there are some problems with the borders. The borders remain open whereas I want them closed. Also, in the last row, I want the vertical line gone, ie I want just one column in the last row. Can someone please fix it? Here are my code and my table:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\begin{document}
\begin{table} [h!]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Parameters & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Model 1} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Model 2}\\
\midrule
& Coefficient & 95\% CI
& Coefficient & 95\% CI \\
\midrule
$\beta_{concern_2}$ & $0.190^{\ast}$ & (0.113, 0.268) & 0.171 & (0.100, 0.241)\\
$\beta_{concern_3}$ & 0.117 & (0.043, 0.191) & 0.117 & (0.050, 0.183)\\
$\beta_{concern_4}$ & 0.210 & (0.139, 0.281) & 0.190 & (0.127, 0.253)\\
$\beta_{concern_5}$ & 0.204 & (0.135, 0.273) & 0.111 & ( 0.049, 0.173)\\
$\beta_{breath_2}$ & 0.157 & (0.07,8 0.236) & 0.208 & (0.136, 0.280) \\
$\beta_{breath_3}$ & 0.115 & (0.041, 0.189) & 0.100 & (0.034, 0.166) \\
$\beta_{breath_4}$ & 0.236 & (0.160, 0.311) & 0.301 & ( 0.234, 0.368)\\
$\beta_{breath_5}$ & 0.092 & (0.020, 0.163) & 0.079 & (0.015, 0.144) \\
$\beta_{weath_2}$ & 0.164 & ( 0.092, 0.236) & 0.137 & (0.071, 0.203) \\
$\beta_{weath_3}$ & 0.160 & (0.089, 0.231) & 0.199 & (0.135, 0.263) \\
$\beta_{weath_4}$ & 0.141 & (0.067, 0.215) & 0.133 & (0.066, 0.199) \\
$\beta_{weath_5}$ & 0.176 & (0.103, 0.249) & 0.257 & (0.191, 0.323)\\
$\beta_{sleep_2}$ & 0.111 & (0.036, 0.187) & 0.135 & (0.068 0.203) \\
$\beta_{sleep_3}$ & 0.110 & (0.036 0.184) & 0.176 & 0.110 0.242 \\
$\beta_{sleep_4}$ & 0.131 & (0.056 0.205 & 0.162 & 0.095 0.229 \\
$\beta_{sleep_5}$ & 0.011 & (-0.064, 0.086) & 0.034 & (-0.033, 0.101) \\
$\beta_{act_2}$ & 0.135 & (0.060, 0.209) & 0.033 & (-0.033, 0.100) \\
$\beta_{act_3} $ &0.195 & (0.121, 0.269) & 0.203 & ( 0.137, 0.268)\\
$\beta_{act_4} $ & 0.214 & ( 0.139, 0.290) & 0.254 & (0.186 0.321) \\
$\beta_{act_5} $ & 0.224 & (0.154, 0.294) & 0.158 & (0.095, 0.221) \\
\hline
& *statistically significant at 5\% level \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Regression Coefficients of model 1 and model 2 }
\label{beta}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\end{document}
Best Answer
That's by design: the author of
booktabs
hates vertical rules in tables and I fully agree with him. You could act on spacing parameters, namely\abovetopsep
(0pt by default), used above a\toprule
\belowbottomsep
(0pt by default), used below a\bottomrule
\aboverulesep
(0.4ex by default), used above a\midrule
,\cmidrule
or\bottomrule
\belowrulesep
(0.65ex by default), used below a\midrule
,\cmidrule
or\toprule
They are all rigid length (no
plus
orminus
specifications are allowed and they wouldn't make sense anyway).By (locally) setting these parameters to zero, the vertical rules will match, but it would simpler not to use
booktabs
commands at all: the heavier\toprule
and\bottomrule
would be completely out of place.Don't use vertical rules and the appearance of your table will improve immediately.
I've made some notable changes.
The subscripts are upright, being words
The alignment is improved by using features of the table itself; for instance, the third and fifth column are right aligned because of the minus signs only in the first coordinate; it wouldn't be so if the minus sign appeared also in the second coordinate or the headers had been wider.
With
\cmidrule
it's easier to show how the headers group the columns.A trick is used for avoiding the * to take up space.
An
array
trick is used for setting all columns in math mode, ensuring that the minus signs are printed as such.\centering
is used instead of thecenter
environment (that adds vertical space).If you need to change "95% CI" to "95% Bayesian Interval", the best is to split the long phrase into two lines: modify the block
into