I'm using ntheorem
with the amsthm
option, to define a theorem-like environment for stating notes:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[amsthm]{ntheorem}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\theoremheaderfont{\normalfont\itshape}
\theorembodyfont{\normalfont}
\newtheorem*{myenv}{Note}
\begin{document}
\begin{myenv}
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
\end{myenv}
\end{document}
I should be getting an environment beginning with the word 'Note' in italic font, followed by the contents in normal roman font. Instead, I get 'Note' in boldface roman and the body in italic:
Trying to define a new theoremstyle doesn't seem to work either:
\newtheoremstyle{nonumberabc}%
{\item[\normalfont\itshape \hskip\labelsep ##1\theorem@separator]\normalfont}%
{\item[{\normalfont\itshape \hskip \labelsep ##3}\theorem@separator]\normalfont}
\theoremstyle{abc}
\newtheorem*{myenv}{Note}
this gives the same results with the above document.
What am I doing wrong?
The problem does not occur if I drop the amsthm
option – but then I don't get some nice amsthm definitions I'm expecting… (it was psychologically hard enough to drop amsthm for ntheorem after years or use!) Most importantly, I like the amsthm
proof environment. So, for those suggesting that I just drop amsthm
– how can I reproduce proof with the exact same behavior (including the QED box size etc.) with ntheorem
? I can't just lift code out of ntheorem
, because it doesn't seem to use its own theoremstyle commands to get the proof environment. Rather, it does something else.
Best Answer
It is possible to "lift" the
proof
environment code fromntheorem
:The QED-symbol is displayed when using the
thmmarks
package option ofntheorem
. Inntheorem
this is manually defined in\openbox
, and subsequently used as\proofSymbol
.