What's the quickest way to adopt the Chicago style for the bibliography (assuming natbib is used)?
[Tex/LaTex] Natbib and Chicago
chicago-stylenatbib
Related Solutions
You can use the biblatex-chicago package with some extra modifications to implement this fairly easily. The biblatex-chicago package recommends using biber for sorting instead of bibtex.
As some of the comments have noted, in the natural and behavioural sciences, I think quotation marks are rarely used.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@phdthesis{Doe11,
title={The Title},
author={Doe, J.},
year={2011},
school={University of Mars}
},
@article{JohSil05,
title={EbayesThresh: R programs for Empirical Bayes Thresholding},
author={Johnstone, I.M. and Silverman, B.W.},
journal={Journal of Statistical Software},
volume={12},
number={8},
pages={1--38},
year={2005}
},
@book{Joh11,
title = {Gaussian estimation: Sequence and multiresolution models},
author = {Johnstone, Ian M.},
year = {2011},
}
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[authordate]{biblatex-chicago}
\DeclareFieldFormat[article]{title}{\mkbibquote{#1}} % make article titles in quotes
\DeclareFieldFormat[thesis]{title}{\mkbibemph{#1}} % make theses italics
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
\nocite{*}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
The bibliography style file chicago.bst is quite ancient; according to the header information given in the file, it was last updated in 1992 [!]. If you're stuck with chicago.bst, though, you may want to do the following:
Find the file
chicago.bstin your file system (likely under../bibtex/bst/chicago, where..is the root of the TeX distribution), make a copy and call the new file, say,mychicago.bst.Open
mychicago.bstin your favorite text editorSearch for the function
FUNCTION {output.year.check}(it starts on line 266 in my copy of this file). In this function, replace the line{ ", " * month * ")" * }with
{ ")" * }(I.e., make BibTeX do the same thing whether or not a
monthfield is present in a given entry.)Regarding how (not) to process the contents of a
notefield (assuming one is present): For this case, I recommend that you go through each of the 12 instances of so of the following two linesnew.block note outputand choose which instances you want to comment out (using
%, as usual) and which ones you want to keep. I could imagine you'd want to comment out these instructions for entries of type@articleand@book, whereas you may well want to keep them for entries of type@miscand@unpublished.Save the file and update the TeX filename database if necessary. E.g., if you use TeXLive or MacTeX, you could type
texhashat a command prompt.Use the bibliography style
mychicagofrom now on.
Best Answer
\bibliographystyle{chicago}just before your\bibliographycommand.