[Tex/LaTex] Latex Template for this type of Resume

I am searching endlessly for the Latex template for this type of resume. If anyone has the link then it would be immensely helpful! Thanks!

_{(source: leahrn.org)}

Best Answer

The full template you posted itself is here:

http://links.tedpavlic.com/tex/tpavlic_cv_faculty.tex

You can compile directly with pdflatex.

And Ted's Home Page is also here with lots of stuff:

http://www.tedpavlic.com/post_resume_cv_latex_example.php

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] LaTeX Resume Templates Modifications

The original template as well as the code you are giving us is a bit of a mess ;-)

The first error you encounter is thrown because you try to bold face a hyperlink. If you want the stuff bold, do \href{http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/41/tex-latex-and-friends}{\bfseries A nice place to hang out}.
I redefined the \lineunder macro to use predefined LaTeX lengths, they can be changed to suit personal taste.
If you want the resume to be justified, remove \raggedright which makes a ragged right margin.
If you want the font to be bigger, my first duggestion would be to remove \small which makes the current font smaller. If you feel to need an even bigger font size, do as Torbjørn says in the comments and use either 11pt or 12pt.

The whole thing was cluttered with changes of horizontal space, which was obviously due to a positive parskip as well as spurious spaces. I set the parindent to zero, which can be done in this case without any regrets.

I left the rest of the resume template untouched and recommend everybody not to use it.

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\newcommand{\lineunder}{\vspace*{-8pt} \\ \hspace*{-18pt} \hrulefill \\}
\renewcommand{\lineunder}{\par\hrulefill\bigbreak}
\newcommand{\header}[1]{{\large{\textsc{#1}}\par}\lineunder}
\newcommand{\school}[3]{\textbf{#1} #2 #3\par}
\raggedright
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
\renewcommand{\underline}{}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\begin{document}
%\small
\header{Research Interests}
\school{\href{http://www.northsouth.edu/}{\textbf{I am searching Zelda}}; Summer-2012;}
{\href{http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/41/tex-latex-and-friends}{A
nice place to hang out}; Country }
{$\bullet$ \underline{GPA}:- 3.79/4.00 $\bullet$ \underline{Major GPA}:- 3.84/4.00 $\bullet$ \underline{Honors}:-\textit{Magna Cum Laude}}
\end{document}

ibrahimResume

[Tex/LaTex] LaTeX Resume, Code Review for style and advice

Typographically

_{I've hardly a leg to stand on here, but this is just a comparison to other documents I've seen.}

Your resume is, in my honest opinion, an impenetrable wall of text. Your skills are completely hidden by ink. I would suggest you go with a more spread-out style, but that is of course your design choice and hardly anyone will say say 'Man, the character density on this page is extremely high.'

The rules beneath your titles are placed haphazardly and the spacing is noticeably uneven. (Compare 'Education' with 'Interests'.) This can easily be fixed by using techniques to maintain consistency.

LaTeXnically

As I said, the code is inconsistently structured. You're giving typesetting commands when you should be giving structure commands—leaving the typesetting to the class and packages. LaTeX documents are designed to separate the typesetting rules from structure from content. When reading the main text, you should hardly ever come across an \hfill, \vspace, \addtolength, or similar. (There are exceptions, but these are few and far between.)

Your definition of \sbullet is clever, but paralist already provides intra-paragraph list options.
The sections of your document aren't clearly marked as such. You can use the titlesec package to customize how text marked with \section looks. (There's even the pre-cooked ability to add title rules!)
When you are describing your abilities (i.e. Blah blah: blah, blahlet, blahsophet, …), you really should (logically speaking) be using a description list.
Each time you begin an itemize environment, you are setting several lengths. It would be more appropriate to create your own environment that has these lengths pre-defined or, better yet, use the enumitem package to do so globally.
The -- ligature was designed for ranges; you'll find it looks more pleasing to the eye, too.
Minor point: don't use \emph when you really mean to italicize. \emph is design to switch back and forth depending on context, whereas \textit will always be italicized. In this case, you know exactly how you want it typeset all the time, so IMO you can be specific. (But not here! This should be defined in your structure definitions.)
Point that should be absorbed but ignored in favor of a package based solution:
When you begin any group—as you do when you start a new environment like itemize—changes you make to lengths and such are local to the group unless explicitly stated otherwise. So, you could rather have said
```
\begin{itemize}
  \setlength{\itemsep}{0cm}
  \setlength{\parskip}{0cm}
  \addtolength{\leftskip}{-5mm}
    \item Languages: Python (Active Tutor and Speaker), …
    \item Typesetting \& Markup Packages: reST (rst), …
    \item Statistics Languages \& Packages: R Statistics …
\end{itemize}
```
Of course, it would be better to represent this specific example as a proper description list and modify its appearance with enumitem.

Personal Thingies

Feel free to ignore any and all of these.

I would maintain some sort of typographical marker when you're talking about a program. (I use \textsl in my own resume, but this of course is wrapped by a more descriptive \program macro.)
I wouldn't be so quick to capitalize (as in 'Troubleshot Computers and Networks')

A complete example implementation is available as a gist. It includes the very class I use for my resume and modifies your preamble and example content to be more 'LaTeXy'.

If you'd like to see what it looks like, you can download the PDF directly from the gist.