I implemented this for a large R&D lab. We produced several hundred (if not thousand) documents per year, and the LaTeX Users' community there wanted to be able to produce documents using 'tex as well as WYSIWYG software.
The OP was right in that a well-defined workflow is essential. Part of this is the process, but you may also need to think about training and using a common repository, and how to implement corporate design.
Process
We implemented a process that allowed people to work in LaTeX and then switch to .docx for collaborators.
- Define a class file that contains the correct formatting, etc, using article, report or book classes. Include the minimum number of up-to-date packages in the class and add the
nag
package to make sure that you (and other users) can see that those packages are not deprecated.
- Create a template showing how to use the class file
- Create an SVN (or git, or whatever) repository for the class and template files, and distribute the URL of the repository to LaTeX users
- Create documents using the lab-standard class file
- Convert the tex files to .docx using Pandoc, which works on Windows, Mac, and Linux
- Get edits and peer reviews done on the .docx
- Transfer edits from the .doc or .docx document back in to 'tex manually, and complete the PDF production in LaTeX.
- Tagging the document using Adobe Acrobat for Section 508 compliance (accessibility).
N.B. Using one of the web-based editors like sharelatex.com or overleaf.com can remove the need for 5-7, especially now that they have rather good review tools.
Challenges
There were a couple of challenges we had to face to get this adopted.
- Getting the editors and reviewers something that fit with their existing process, hence the use of the .docx format
- Figuring out how to get the same class file(s) to all users, hence the SVN repository
- Making sure people know how to use it, hence the template
- Figuring out tools that let people collaborate. But that's a whole other post!
508 Compliance / Structured PDFs
The one thing that is still causing trouble is 508-compliance. I have been working (slowly) on using the pdfcomment
package to add tooltips and modifying the accessibility
package so that documents are accessible. My test PDF documents sometimes pass automated testing in Adobe Acrobat...
Repository
I've put a set of demo documents in a Github repository which may be helpful.
Note re. Pandoc
3 Dec 2017: Originally I suggested the use of latex2rtf instead of Pandoc. I am now editting this answer to suggest Pandoc as I find Pandoc is kept up to date, works well, and I like the flexibility to choose from many more input and output file types.
We start by first making a dummy document and hoping that the italics are made by that button that lives between the bold and the underline buttons.
So a dummy text
Then if you can find the %$#&%#?@! Find & Replace
button on that ever changing menu like thingy, click Replace
First click in the text box of Find
and click Format
button and then font. Only click Italics
and nothing else. Then OK
. OK?
Now click in the Replace
box and type \emph{^&}
, then click format and font again and select Regular
and nothing else.
The result should look like
Then keep your expectations low and click Replace All
, I got this
Back in the day, we had to record macros and other kind of VBA nonsense. At least it supports it out of the box. I'm gonna wash my hands now, happy recording :)
Best Answer
I do have Office 2011: this is not true (with the exception that you can use Word to save plain text, of course). As Herbert has commented, the equation editor in recent versions of Office has been much improved, and uses a lot of ideas from TeX.