I use txfonts and \texttt in italics in math mode, but the letters' italic correction is not working: an italic/"TT" letter "d" adjacent to a closing parenthesis touches it. Here is minimal sample code:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{txfonts}
\newcommand*{\halfthinspace}{\kern .08333em} % not sure whether I got this value right
\newcommand*{\shorthalfthinspace}{\kern .06em}
\newcommand*{\somefunction}[1]{\textit{F}(#1)}
\newcommand*{\ittt}[1]{\textit{\texttt{#1}}}
\begin{document}
\(\somefunction{\ittt{pd}}\) (what I get)
\(\somefunction{\ittt{pd}\shorthalfthinspace}\) (I want this)
\(\somefunction{\ittt{pd}\halfthinspace}\) (or this)
This is entity \ittt{pd}. (use of \verb|\ittt| within text; the spacing here is good)
\(\ittt{pd} \times \ittt{pd}\) (the space before the times symbol is minimally too thin)
\end{document}
To include additional space in the definition of \somefunction (\newcommand*{\somefunction}[1]{\textit{F}(#1\shorthalfthinspace)}) seems to be semantically the wrong approach. To include additional space in the definition of \ittt seems equally wrong, especially since I would occasionally like to use \ittt within text (see line 4 generated by my sample code) and don't want additional spacing before the sentence-final period. Finally, I may use \ittt in other contexts, such as around a \times operator (see line 5 generated by my sample code); the spacing doesn't only look too thin, it is too thin (easy to verify by turning the result by 180° in your viewer).
What it the easiest way to get appropriate spacing in all situations?
Note: I don't know whether this is an italic correction issue or something to do with \texttt or the structure of my macros. Feel free to improve the title of my question accordingly.
Best Answer
\somefunctionI have remove
\textitentirely. In math mode variables (a-zA-Zα-ο) are usually typeset in italic shape. Math mode takes care of the italic correction (betweenFand(in this case).If you want to use
\somefunctionin text, use always inline math (\(…\)).It wouldn't be that wrong to use a simple definition for the entity (
pd) and “fix” the spacing inside\somefunction(or better:entityFunction/\funcOfEnt/…) except when parenthesized entities will be used more often and outside of a function, like(\entity{pd} + \entity{qr}) x, than the definition of the function should use the already patched\entityto be more consistent.\textitand\textttI don't think there is a total automatic solution available for fixing the problem with
)and following punctuation.Let's take a look at the options:
\itttYour original
\itttwas defined as\itttmIf you only use your entities in text mode before punctuation,
\itttmcan work for you. It adds italic correction only in math mode.\itttpThe macro
\itttptypsets a second optional parameter in italic shape (but not in the typewriter family). This has been discussed on TeX.SE already.In my eyes, this is even too tight.
\ttitSwitching
\textitand\textttgives us italic correction. But it also adds this italic correction before punctuation mark where you don't want it (i.e.,.and,).\ttitcLike
\ttit, but:The if-macro
\@ifnextcharremoves the italic correction before.and,with a negative kern.\emphor\textit?I also tested both variants with
\emph:\emph{\texttt{pd}}is a little better before), and as good as\itttbefore punctuation\texttt{\emph{pd}}is as bad as\ttit.\entity[*]{<arg>}I also declared another macro:
\entity. It does exist in a non-starred and a starred form.Use the starred form if you do not want italic correction (i.e. before
.and,).Conclusion
I think the best solutions are:
\itttmif you need italic correction only in math mode.\ttitcif can handle a few cases where the automatically inserted correction has to be re-corrected\entityif you're willing to use a switch (the*) to toggle italic correction (it should be doable to use\@ifnextcharin\entity, too).Code
Output