I'm contemplating the idea of a document layout where citations are author-year-style, but given as footnotes. That is, those notes would be (for the most part) very short, which is a bad match for the one-column footnote layout of the standard classes. One possible remedy is to consolidate footnotes into a single paragraph per page, as done (e.g.) by the para
option of the footmisc
package:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[para]{footmisc}
\begin{document}
\null\vfill% just for the example
Some text.\footnote{Author 2001} Some more text.\footnote{Buthor 2002}
And some more.\footnote{Cuthor 2003} Does this text ever end?\footnote{Duthor 2004}
Yes.\footnote{Euthor 2005}
\end{document}
Another option is to typeset footnotes in two columns (with the running text still one-column). This can be achieved with the dblfnote
package:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{dblfnote}
\DFNalwaysdouble% no attempt to fit footnotes into a single column
\begin{document}
\null\vfill% just for the example
Some text.\footnote{Author 2001} Some more text.\footnote{Buthor 2002}
And some more.\footnote{Cuthor 2003} Does this text ever end?\footnote{Duthor 2004}
Yes.\footnote{Euthor 2005}
\end{document}
What I'm looking for is a layout similar to that of dblfnote
, but with footnotes typeset in three columns. Can this be done with reasonable effort? (I'm hoping for a clever hack of either dblfnote
's macros or of the typesetting routines of the multicol
package.)
Notes: multicol
-like column balancing is not required, and I'm indifferent as to whether column breaks within footnotes should be permitted or not (dblfnote
offers both options).
Best Answer
The
memoir
class provides three-column footnotes. In all it provides four kinds of footnote layouts: normal, two-column, three-column, and run together in a single paragraph.