[Tex/LaTex] how to write more words on the same line
line-spacingspacing
Is there any way to write the number 37 from the below image on the same line with equal sign?
\textbf{3.} Afla\c ti de\^ imp\u ar\c titul \c stiind c\u a \^ intre \^ imp\u ar\c titor, c\^ at \c si rest avem rela\c tia $i^2+c^2+r^2=37$.
Thanks!
Best Answer
Rather than enclosing the math formula inside \mbox, as John Kormylo suggests, I’d define a command that prohibits line breaks inside a math formula. Indeed, this allows the glue inside the formula to stretch and shrink together with other glue on the same line, whereas John’s solution does not.
% My standard header for TeX.SX answers:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article} % To avoid confusion, let us explicitly
% declare the paper format.
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % Not always necessary, but recommended.
% End of standard header. What follows pertains to the problem at hand.
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\prohibitmathbreaks}{%
\binoppenalty \@M
\relpenalty \@M
}
\hyphenpenalty = \@M % ONLY for this example: DO NOT INCLUDE IN YOUR DOCUMENTS!
\makeatother
\begin{document}
Some meaningless text, inserted just to get near\ldots\ the end of the line.
\( x+y=a+b\prohibitmathbreaks \).
And some more random text that adds other lines, which~contain~an unbreakable
sequence of words, to show that the spaces inside the formula \emph{are} allowed
to shrink.
On the other hand, if one uses the \verb|\mbox| solution, this does not happen:
\mbox{\( x+y=a+b \).}
And: some more random text that adds other lines, which~contain
unbreakable~sequences~of~words.
Another paragraph, containing another formula, in order to show that the effect
of our \verb|\prohibitmathbreaks| command is kept local:
\( a+b+c+d+e = x+y+z \).
\end{document}
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{array,ragged2e}
\def\HS{\rule[-1cm]{0pt}{1.1cm}}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{@{} >{\Centering}b{300pt}}\hline
\HS Dr. AAAAA\\\hline
\HS Dr. BBBBB\\\hline
\HS Dr. CCCCC\\\hline
\HS Dr. DDDD \\\hline
Dr. EEEEE
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
Best Answer
Rather than enclosing the math formula inside
\mbox
, as John Kormylo suggests, I’d define a command that prohibits line breaks inside a math formula. Indeed, this allows the glue inside the formula to stretch and shrink together with other glue on the same line, whereas John’s solution does not.Output: