arXiv is smart enough to detect whether your PDF is generated by LaTeX.
If it is, arXiv asks for the sources of the PDF instead of the PDF file itself.
This is really annoying and inconvenient.
I ask a way to fool the arXiv and avoid PDFs being detected as generated by LaTeX (even if they were indeed).
I have tried this: http://www.hrstc.org/node/62:
"create a pdf from word and then simply insert pages from your article, and delete the word's page".
And it did not work.
Best Answer
Update 2018-11-26: According to the comment from Andrew MacFie, this method no longer works: the arXiv have put in place a check specifically for this. Whether or not they have solved the underlying problem, I have no idea. Whether or not a variation of this solution would work, I have no idea.
I strongly advise uploading the source code to the arXiv for archival purposes. Once the document itself is made public, there is no reason I can think of for not making the source code public. That said, there can be reasons for avoiding the arXiv's own compiler if it doesn't have up to date versions of packages that you use and, for example, uploading the entirety of TikZ/PGF with your document seems a little excessive. (NB For TikZ/PGF specifically, the
external
library is a big help here.)Include a PDF copy of the article with your submission (with a slightly modified filename), and at the top of the document put the following (suitably edited):
I think that to comply with the spirit of the arXiv, in that you're making stuff generally available, then if you are doing this then you should go the extra mile and include something like the list of packages used with their versions so that someone who downloads the source will know what they need in order to compile it.
I can attest to the fact that this has worked in the past.