For my PhD thesis, I am including a List of appended papers automagically. To generate the references, I used to use \bibentry
, but now I switched to biblatex and headed for \fullcite
hoping it to be an equivalent. Alas, \fullcite
uses maxcitenames
to decide the number of authors; I'd like it to use maxbibnames
so that the number of authors printed is like it is in the bibliogaphy.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[maxbibnames=99,maxcitenames=1]{biblatex}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@misc{A01,
author = {Author, A. and Buthor, B. and Cuthor, C. and Duthor, D.},
year = {2001},
title = {Alpha},
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
This is by \textcite{A01}, or, more completely:
\fullcite{A01}.
\printbibliography
\end{document}
The desired effect:
This is by Author et al. [1], or, more completely, A. Author, B. Buthor, C. Cuthor, and D. Duthor, Alpha, 2001
The actual effect:
How do I get a full citation with all authors (or maxbibnames
no. of authors) with \fullcite
or a similar command in biblatex
? If I change maxcitenames
, then Author et al. [1]
will also be affected, and this is not desired.
All my \fullcite
occurences are concentrated in one part of the document that uses no other citation commands, so a solution temporarily changing maxcitenames
would be acceptable for me.
Best Answer
You may change the definition of the
\fullcite
and\footfullcite
cite macros so that they locally use the value ofmaxbibnames
.