I could need some help figuring out how to properly enter and print working papers with biblatex-chicago
?
I used to have entries like this (prior to switching to biblatex):
@workingpaper{silverstein1981limits-awareness,
Address = {Austin},
Author = {Silverstein, Michael},
Language = {en},
Number = {84},
Publisher = {Southwest Educational Development Laboratory},
Series = {Sociolinguistic Working Paper},
Title = {The Limits of Awareness},
Year = {1981}}
some also with an url field.
But biblatex
doesn't include @workingpaper
anymore. According to the manual one should use the @unpublished
category. However if I change it to unpublished
it only prints:
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. “The Limits of Awareness.” Austin.
which is not enough information if one wants to follow Chicago. CMoS recommends treating working papers like theses/dissertations or lectures/presentations. This is the example from their website which I'd like to replicate (adapted for author-date format):
Dyer, Lee, and Jeff Ericksen. 1980. "Complexity-Based Agile
Enterprises: Putting Self-Organizing Emergence to Work." CAHRS Working
Paper 08-01, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for
Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/473.
Thus for my example above I'd like to end up with (for author date):
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. "The Limits of Awareness." Sociolinguistic
Working Paper 84, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory,
Austin.
How do I get @unpublished
to print that additional information about publisher
, series,
and number
? Or how should I modify my entry to get what I want?
Best Answer
I think you are looking for the
@report
entry type which is described as "A technical report, research report, or white paper published by a university or some other institution. [...] The sponsoring institution goes in theinstitution
field." (p. 11 of thebiblatex
documentation).The type or series of the report goes into the
type
field (withbiblatex-chicago
series
would also be acceptable, but the standard styles only allowtype
here, so it seems to be a good idea to stick totype
), the number of the report intonumber
.gives