That's some interesting behaviour you observed! You could regard this as kind of a bug in the LaTeX kernel. So what's happening here? There's some vertical space below the display (\belowdisplayskip
) and after the theorem (the \thm@postskip
of 2cm
that you specified). Now LaTeX is designed such that it doesn't add the sum but the larger one of those two vertical spaces (which is good).
The problem arises in how the larger of the spaces is chosen. This is done in LaTeX's \@xaddvskip
, which only compares the "natural length" components of the spaces, but not the available stretch and shrink. In your case, \belowdisplayskip
is 4.19998pt plus 4.19998pt
and \thm@postskip
is 56.9055pt
. Usually the latter is larger, but you have a situation where the space is stretched about 128 times more than generally permitted (which is why you get an Underfull \vbox
warning!). Therefore, \belowdisplayskip
is actually the larger of the two spaces, but \@xaddvskip
adds only the smaller \thm@postskip
of 2cm
below the display.
In my opinion, a good solution is to work with the maximum of the two vertical spaces, in the following sense: use the maximum of the natural and stretch components, and the minimum of the shrink components. I've implemented an appropriate modification of \@xaddvskip
in the code below. In the left you see the output of your code, in the right the output produced with the modified \@xaddvskip
:
You can see that in the improved (right) version there's a bit more space below the equation than above. The reason is that above the equation \abovedisplayskip
is used (4.19998pt plus 4.19998pt
), and below the maximum of \belowdisplayskip
and \thm@postskip
, which amounts to 56.9055pt plus 4.19998pt
, so about 52.7pt
more than above. And that's good, since you wanted additional space below the theorem!
Note that the following code is just a proof of concept, it doesn't work as it should if infinite stretch or shrink components are involved.
\documentclass[a4paper]{amsart}
\makeatletter
\def\@xaddvskip{%
\ifdim\lastskip<\@tempskipb
\edef\last@stretch{\the\gluestretch\lastskip}
\edef\last@shrink{\the\glueshrink\lastskip}
\edef\next@stretch{\the\gluestretch\@tempskipb}
\edef\next@shrink{\the\glueshrink\@tempskipb}
\vskip-\lastskip
\dimen@=\@tempskipb
\vskip\dimen@ plus
\ifdim \last@stretch > \next@stretch
\last@stretch
\else
\next@stretch
\fi
minus
\ifdim \last@shrink < \next@shrink
\last@shrink
\else
\next@shrink
\fi
\else
\ifdim\@tempskipb<\z@
\ifdim\lastskip<\z@
\else
\advance\@tempskipb\lastskip
\vskip-\lastskip
\vskip \@tempskipb
\fi
\fi
\fi}
\makeatother
\usepackage{amsthm}
\newtheoremstyle{myplain} {2cm}% ⟨Space above⟩
{2cm}% ⟨Space below⟩
{\itshape}% ⟨Body font⟩
{}% ⟨Indent amount⟩
{\bfseries}% ⟨Theorem head font⟩
{.}% ⟨Punctuation after theorem head⟩
{.5em}% ⟨Space after theorem head⟩2
{}% ⟨Theorem head spec (can be left empty, meaning ‘normal’)⟩
\theoremstyle{myplain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\begin{document}
\begin{theorem}
It holds
\begin{equation}
2+2=4
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Straightforward.
\end{proof}
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\begin{gather}
2\\
2\\
2\\
\end{gather}
\end{document}
Just for completeness, here's my original e-TeX-free implementation of \getstretch
and \getshrink
:
\begingroup
\catcode`P=12
\catcode`L=12
\catcode`U=12
\catcode`S=12
\catcode`M=12
\catcode`I=12
\catcode`N=12
\catcode`T=12
\lowercase{
\def\x{%
\def\getstretch##1{\expandafter\get@stretch\the##1PLUS 0PT\endmarker}
\def\get@stretch##1PLUS##2PT##3\endmarker{##2}
\def\getshrink##1{\expandafter\get@shrink\the##1MINUS 0PT\endmarker}
\def\get@shrink##1MINUS##2PT##3\endmarker{##2}
}}
\expandafter\endgroup\x
I was struggling with this same problem and couldn't find the modifications mentioned in the comments above, so I'm posting the solution that I eventually arrived at after some trial and error.
Here's the original code block from vancouver.bst
being modified:
% urlbst
FUNCTION {output.nonnull.original}
{ 's :=
output.state mid.sentence =
{ ". " * write$ }
{ output.state after.block =
{ add.period$ write$
newline$
"\newblock " write$
}
{ output.state before.all =
'write$
{ add.period$ " " * write$ }
if$
}
if$
mid.sentence 'output.state :=
}
if$
s
}
I replaced the second add.period$
with add.blank
, and then moved the declaration of add.blank
up from its original location at lines 251-253 to precede this function. The final version looks like this:
FUNCTION {add.blank} % moved up from below
{ " " * before.all 'output.state :=
}
% urlbst
FUNCTION {output.nonnull.original}
{ 's :=
output.state mid.sentence =
{ ". " * write$ }
{ output.state after.block =
{ add.period$ write$
newline$
"\newblock " write$
}
{ output.state before.all =
'write$
{ add.blank " " * write$ } % replaced add.period$
if$
}
if$
mid.sentence 'output.state :=
}
if$
s
}
Best Answer
Move the dot into the argument of
\thmnote
.Full example: