The amsmath
package redefines the \dots
command so that it "guesses" the correct height of the dots with respect to its context. For example
$x, \dots, y$
will produce three lowered dots, aligned with the commas. While
$x \to \dots \to y$
uses centered dots that align with the arrows. However, if I define my own macros, amsmath
can no longer guess and it always uses the lowered dots. For example
\newcommand{\myto}{\to}
$x \myto \dots \myto y$
uses the wrong dots. How can I tell amsmath
that I want centered and not lowered dots?
Btw., I know about \cdots
but what I want is \dots
to still be able to guess the correct ones automatically.
Best Answer
Looking at
amsmath.sty
, I see lots of lines like:I would guess that the
\DOTSB
controls what kind of dots go before (or after?) this symbol. Doingshows that that has the magic
\DOTSB
. So if defining your own macro, I would experiment with adding\DOTSB
,\DOTSI
,\DOTSX
(those appear to be the options) before or after them. (Please report back on what happens!). I would guess that\dots
"knows" about certain commands, but has to be told about any extra.\to
seems to come in under the "known" commands, but, for example, it has to be told about\mapsto
: