As far as I'm concerned, there are three main ways of producing documents using the Garamond typeface for both text and math, namely:
- Using the
mathdesign
package, which lets you use both URW Garamond and Adobe Garamond Pro. newtxmath
package in combination withgaramondx
, which also uses URW Garamond.garamond-math
package, which uses EB Garamond.
Is there any recommendation/best practice or is it just a matter of personal taste?
Can someone point out the main differences between using each method?
Best Answer
I am not an expert - I just looked at the most obvious resource (CTAN).
mathdesign
Was last updated in 2013 and the manual states:
garamond-math
Was last updated in 2019 and the CTAN page states:
I read this as "XeTeX only"?!
newtx
Was last updated in 2020 and seems to be very professional. The manual states:
The CTAN page of
garamondx
states:Conclusion
Without further investigation, I would choose
newtx
.Update: See discussion in the comments of the answer.
Update 2022-01-31
garamond-math is updated and the CTAN site states the following: