Consider the following MWE:
\documentclass{article}
%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\textbf{\textsf{Some text}}
\end{document}
The output of the above code is
and doesn't change if I uncomment the line
%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
Consider now the following MWE with scrartcl
class instead of article
:
\documentclass{scrartcl}
%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
\section{A section}
\textsf{Some text}
\end{document}
Uncommenting the line
%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
you get
As you can see, the sans serif font of the title is less bold than without fontenc
, while the normal text is not changed.
Does fontenc
, combined with a KOMA-script class, load a different sans serif font, but only for bold face?
Best Answer
The source of the difference is not the different design but the the available font sizes:
Without fontenc, in OT1 encoding, for the section title a 10pt font (cmssbx10.pfb) is used which is scaled to 14.4pt. This gives a rather bold looking font. With T1-encoding a font designed for 14.4pt is used (sfsx1440.pfb).
If you like the bolder look then you can either load the
fix-cm
package which will suppress the use of the larger optical sizes. The document will then use sfsx1000.pfb scaled up, or as already suggested use the lmodern package which doesn't have the larger optical sizes.