Using natbib
and apa-good
as style, I am having problems displaying a citation of type website or blog post.
\usepackage{natbib}
\bibliographystyle{apa-good}
\bibliography{msc_thesis}
Test \citep{schroeder_facebook_2012}
msc_thesis.bib
contains, when taking the metadata directly from a website using Zotero:
@misc{schroeder_facebook_2012,
title = {Facebook Hits One Billion Active Users},
url = {http://mashable.com/2012/10/04/facebook-one-billion/},
abstract = {Facebook just officially reached one billion active users, Facebook {CEO} and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg has announced.},
urldate = {2013-07-17},
journal = {Mashable},
author = {Schroeder, Stan},
month = oct,
year = {2012},
}
APA style should be, according to http://www.studygs.net/citation.htm:
Author. (Date published if available; n.d.–no date– if not). Title of article. Title of web site . Retrieved date. From URL.
But what I get is:
Schroeder, S. (2012). Facebook hits one billion active users.
I don't know whether apa-good
is a "good" choice, it has always worked well for other type of media.
Best Answer
A
biblatex
solutionAs I mentioned in the comments, Mico's answer to Internet citation using APA points out that
apa-good.bst
requires theurl
. But since theapa-good.bst
style I found didn't produce the output you're expecting, I'd suggestbiblatex
, which has an APA style (calledbiblatex-apa
).Although the output is the same, a more adequate entry type in biblatex would be
@online
(notice also thedate
field):N.B. According to the manual (ยง1, "Important Changes"),
biblatex-apa
relies on the usage ofbiber
instead ofbibtex
as the backend (It's the default behavior of biblatex, but I added the corresponding option to the MWE to make it clear).About moving to
biblatex
, I'd suggest the following questions:What is the difference between bibtex and biblatex?
bibtex vs. biber and biblatex vs. natbib
What to do to switch to biblatex?
biblatex in a nutshell (for beginners)