Use \nocite
to "cite" the publications in the order you want.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[sorting=none]{biblatex}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@misc{A01,
author = {Author, A.},
year = {2001},
title = {Alpha},
}
@misc{B02,
author = {Buthor, B.},
year = {2002},
title = {Bravo},
}
@misc{C03,
keywords = {pub},
author = {Cuthor, C.},
year = {2003},
title = {Charlie},
}
@misc{Z00,
keywords = {pub},
author = {Zuthor, Z.},
year = {2000},
title = {Zulu},
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
Some text \autocite{B02,A01}.
\nocite{Z00,C03}
\printbibliography[title={Reference list},notkeyword=pub]
\printbibliography[title={List of publications},keyword=pub]
\end{document}
The proper type in biblatex
for a reference work is reference
, and for the item in the reference work, inreference
. But it would be best to refer to a standard for bibliographic style, such as the Chicago Manual of Style, since this is a matter of convention, not logic.
Chicago recommends citing dictionary entries in the text or footnote only as Dictionary, s.v. "entry", and I think this is the best practice when there is no author credited for the entry (and where the article is as short as this one).
In biblatex
, this would be \autocite[s.v. ``Emotional Intelligence'']{Davey2005}
. Davey2005
would be the @reference
entry for the whole reference work, not just the cited article.
(If you are using Chicago style or do not have a style guide, consider using biblatex-chicago
as it will produce results more consistent with usage in humanities writing).
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes} % should be used with biblatex + babel
\usepackage[style=authortitle,natbib=true,citestyle=verbose,backend=biber]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@Incollection{Davis2011TToMI,
Title = {The Theory of Multiple Intelligences},
Address = {New York},
Author = {K. Davis and Christodoulou, J. A. and S. Seider and Gardner, H.},
Booktitle = {Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence},
Pages = {485--503},
Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
Year = {2011},
Editor = {R. J. Sternberg and S. B. Kaufman},
}
@Reference{Davey:Psych,
Title = {Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Psychology},
Editor = {Davey, Graham},
Address = {Oxford},
Publisher = {Routledge},
Year = {2005}
}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{document}
First cite\autocite[s.v.~\mkbibquote{EmotionalIntelligence}]{Davey:Psych}
Other cite\autocite{Davis2011TToMI}
Second cite\autocite[s.v.~\mkbibquote{EmotionalIntelligence}]{Davey:Psych}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
Best Answer
The desired numbering scheme can be achieved by printing the
labelnumber
as the total number of entries in the current reference section, minus the actual label number, plus one.This approach is demonstrated in the document below. It relies on commands from
etoolbox
and allows for an arbitrary number of reference sections.If the document is saved as
doc.tex
, compile with:With
backend=biber
, there is no need to runbiber
on each of the reference sections. You can also accessbib
files remotely from github.Some caveats:
Shorthands. The
labelnumber
is overridden by theshorthand
field. So with shorthands the maximumlabelnumber
in a given reference section doesn't correspond to the total number of cited entries. To handle this you can clear theshorthand
field withbiber
by adding the following source map to the preamble:Data-only entries. The code in
\AtDataInput
is executed for each entry in thebbl
file. This includes related entries or other entries suppressed in the bibliography viaskipbib
ordataonly
. To omit these from the entry total, you should condition on theskipbib
setting.Multiple sorting schemes. If your document uses more than one sorting scheme in a reference section, the
bbl
file will contain duplicate entries - one for each scheme. To avoid counting duplicates, you can track the entries already counted in a list.Multiple versus single
bib
files. Using a singlebib
file for each reference section is convenient, but not necessary - as long as the entries accessed in each section correspond to those printed in the bibliography. For an alternative approach with a single reference section andlabelnumber
prefixes, refer to this post.