Hello there, here is my table but I can't figure out how to arrange (x,y,z) coordinates in a good looking(i mean they are not in a straight line 🙂 ) and also every box , they start appear center-north, for good looking, I want to center-center 🙂 sorry for bad language. thanks advance.
Here is my code, sorry for not arranging it, I haven't get used to TeX.SE yet 🙂
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Step(k) & I.strategy & II.strategy & $\,$ Return $\,$ & Total Return &$\quad$ $g_{i}^r$ $\quad$ &$\quad$ $g_{k}^c$ $\quad$ & $\,$ $U_k$ $\,$ & $\,$ $V_k$ $\,$ & $\displaystyle \frac{minU_k}{k}$ & $ \displaystyle \frac{maxV_k}{k}$ \\[2ex] \hline
1 & $I_1$ & $II_1$ & 9 & 9 & (9,2,-1) & (9,-9,6) & (9,2,{\color{blue}-1}) & ({\color{red}9},-9,6) & -1 & 9 \\[1.5ex] \hline
2 & $I_1$ & $II_3$ &-1 & 8 & (9,2,-1) & (-1,0,2) & (18,4,{\color{blue}-2}) & ({\color{red}8},-9,8) & -1 & 4 \\[1.5ex] \hline
3 & $I_1$ & $II_3$ &-1 & 7 & (9,2,-1) & (-1,0,2) & (27,6,{\color{blue}-3}) & (7,-9,{\color{red}10}) & -1 & $\frac{10}{3}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
4 & $I_3$ & $II_3$ & 2 & 9 & (6,-6,2) & (-1,0,2) & (33,0,{\color{blue}-1}) & (6,-9,{\color{red}12}) & $-\frac{1}{4}$ & $3$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
5 & $I_3$ & $II_3$ & 2 &11 & (6,-6,2) & (-1,0,2) & (39,{\color{blue}-6},1) & (5,-9,{\color{red}14}) & $-\frac{6}{5}$ & $\frac{14}{5}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
6 & $I_3$ & $II_2$ &-6 & 5 & (6,-6,2) & (2,9,-6) & (45,{\color{blue}-12},3) & (7,0,{\color{red}8}) & $-2$ & $\frac{4}{3}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
7 & $I_3$ & $II_2$ &-6 &-1 & (6,-6,2) & (2,9,-6) & (51,{\color{blue}-18},5) & ({\color{red}9},9,2) & $-\frac{18}{7}$ & $\frac{9}{7}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
8 & $I_1$ & $II_2$ & 2 & 1 & (9,2,-1) & (2,9,-6) & (60,{\color{blue}-16},4) & (11,{\color{red}18},-4) & $-2$ & $\frac{9}{4}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
9 & $I_2$ & $II_2$ & 9 &10 & (-9,9,0) & (2,9,-6) & (51,{\color{blue}-7},4) & (13,{\color{red}17},-10) & $-\frac{7}{9}$ & $\frac{17}{9}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
10 & $I_2$ & $II_2$ & 9 &19 & (-9,9,0) & (2,9,-6) & (42,{\color{blue}2},4) & (15,{\color{red}26},-16) & $\frac{1}{5}$ & $\frac{13}{5}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
11 & $I_2$ & $II_2$ & 9 &28 & (-9,9,0) & (2,9,-6) & (33,11,{\color{blue}4}) & (17,{\color{red}35},-22) & $\frac{4}{11}$ & $\frac{35}{11}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
12 & $I_2$ & $II_3$ & 0 &28 & (-9,9,0) & (-1,0,2) & (24,20,{\color{blue}4}) & (16,{\color{red}35},-20) & $\frac{1}{3}$ & $\frac{35}{12}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
13 & $I_2$ & $II_3$ & 0 &28 & (-9,9,0) & (-1,0,2) & (15,29,{\color{blue}4}) & (15,{\color{red}35},-18) & $\frac{4}{13}$ & $\frac{35}{13}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
14 & $I_2$ & $II_3$ & 0 &28 & (-9,9,0) & (-1,0,2) & (6,38,{\color{blue}4}) & (14,{\color{red}35},-16) & $\frac{4}{14}$ & $\frac{35}{14}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
15 & $I_2$ & $II_3$ & 0 &28 & (-9,9,0) & (-1,0,2) & ({\color{blue}-3},47,4) & (13,{\color{red}35},-14) & $-\frac{3}{5}$ & $\frac{7}{3}$ \\[1.5ex] \hline
\end{tabular}
Best Answer
I suggest a more open look to the table and also some tricks for simplifying the input.
However, I believe that the slashed form
10/3
would render better than\frac{10}{3}
.