The footmisc
package describes 3 additional systems in which one can apply numbering to footnotes in a paper:
bringhurst: ∗, †, ‡, §, ||, ¶.
chicago: ∗, †, ‡, §, ||, #.
wiley: ∗, ∗∗, †, ‡, §, ¶, ||.
This is in addition to these methods:
arabic numerals: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
roman numerals: I, II, III, IV, V.
letters: a, b, c, d, e.
For my purposes, I think a system such as bringhurst, chicago, or wiley are suitable, because custom symbols are used:
- Arabic numerals appear to frequently throughout my document already.
- I can't find single-character unicode roman numerals exceeding 12. When rendered in XeTex, numbers above (such as "ⅫⅡ") appear with an added space.
- The letters in the alphabet look too much like the text of the document.
However, I find that the bringhurst, chicago, or wiley systems has some problems:
- They are limited to 6 or 7 symbols. I need at least 30, if not more.
- They do not appear to follow a logical pattern explaining the order or shape.
- They use symbols such as ¶, § and #, which I think usually carry very different meanings.
Are there any other sets of symbols within LaTeX's packages or from unicode which you think could make good footnote marks?
Best Answer
From the alphalph package documentation: