\frac not putting first input over the numerator under very weird conditions

fractionsoverleaf

I'm basically brand new to Latex, so maybe this has a really simple answer I'm not seeing, but I'm having a problem where \frac isn't putting my first input over the numerator but instead to the side of the fraction.

the code looks like this

$\limi a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2} $

but it ends up looking like this

It's worth noting that \limi is a custom command I made with code

\newcommand{\limi}{$\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}$}

In addition, If I change \frac to be \tfrac or \dfrac it works just fine

Ex.

$\limi a_n=\limi \dfrac{1}{2} $

And last thing I've noticed is that if I delete my \limi command it fixes the problem, and \frac works like normal. So I'm guessing that it has something to do with my command code, but I can't figure out what's causing it. Help would be very much appreciated.

P.S.(I know that this equation doesn't make any sense, I changed the fraction to test the code, and so it would be easier to see)

Best Answer

With the simple example

\documentclass{article}

\newcommand{\limi}{$\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}$}

\begin{document}

$\limi a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2} $

\end{document}

and hit return when errors are raised, I get the following on the console

This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.23 (TeX Live 2022/dev) (preloaded format=pdflatex)
 restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./limi.tex
LaTeX2e <2021-06-01> patch level 1
L3 programming layer <2021-08-27>
(/usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
Document Class: article 2021/02/12 v1.4n Standard LaTeX document class
(/usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo))
(/usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3backend/l3backend-pdftex.def)
No file limi.aux.
! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
                $
l.7 $\limi
           a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2} $
?
! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
                $
l.7 $\limi a_
             n=\limi \frac{1}{2} $
?
! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
                $
l.7 $\limi a_n=\limi
                     \frac{1}{2} $
?
! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
                $
l.7 $\limi a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2}
                                 $
?
! Extra }, or forgotten $.
\frac  #1#2->{\begingroup #1\endgroup \over #2}

l.7 $\limi a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2}
                                 $
?
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
(./limi.aux) )
(\end occurred inside a group at level 1)

### simple group (level 1) entered at line 7 ({)
### bottom level</usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts
/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c
m/cmr10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/
cmr7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2021/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cms
y7.pfb>
Output written on limi.pdf (1 page, 36624 bytes).
Transcript written on limi.log.

When TeX issues an error message, it's essentially impossible to obtain correct output if one simply scrolls past errors.

Modify your code into

\newcommand{\limi}{\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}}

and you'll get no error, but dubiously useful output, because \limits will make the formula too big vertically to fit in a line. Example:

\documentclass{article}

\newcommand{\limi}{\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}}

\begin{document}

some text some text some text some text some text some text 
some text some text some text some text some text some text 
$\limi a_n=\limi \frac{1}{2} $
some text some text some text some text some text some text 
some text some text some text some text some text some text 

\end{document}

Output

Remove also \limits.

Related Solutions

Overleaf math mode misplacing bug

My guess is that you really need to check your browser settings: Not only have lots of instances of $ gone missing, but there are also (at least) six instances -- in just the code fragment you've posted -- of inline math expressions having been "doubled up". E.g., ψ(x)=2x<1 is prefixed to \psi(x) = 2x < 1, 12<x<1 is prefixed to \frac{1}{2} < x < 1, etc.

Not being much on Overleaf user myself, all I can suggest is that you contact their helpdesk directly and ask them for assistance in fixing your browser settings.

Anyway, after supplying the missing instances of $, commenting out the funky code doublets, and addressing other, slightly odd aspects of your code -- e.g., by replacing \; \rvert \; with \bigm\vert -- one is left with the following code, which may be close to what you actually want.

\documentclass{article}
 %\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % that's the default nowadays
 \usepackage{CJKutf8} % are you sure you need this?
 \usepackage{amsmath} 
 \usepackage{bm}
 \usepackage{amssymb} 
 \usepackage{graphicx}
 \usepackage{cancel}
 \usepackage[margin=2cm]{geometry}

\begin{document}

\noindent
\textbf{Exercise 10.1.4}

\noindent
We observe that if 
%x<12  %% huh?! #1
$x < \frac{1}{2}$, 
%ψ(x)=2x<1  %% huh?! #2
$\psi(x) = 2x < 1$ 
and if 
%12<x<1   %% huh?! #3
$\frac{1}{2} < x < 1$, 
%ψ(x)=2x−1  %% huh?! #4
$\psi(x) = 2x - 1$.
So for any 
%[a,b]⊂[0,1)  %% huh?! #5
$[a,b] \subset [ 0 , 1 )$, 
we separate 
%ψ−1([a,b])  %% huh?! #6
$\psi^{-1}([a,b])$ 
into two parts, i.e.,
\begin{align*}
\psi^{-1}( [ a , b ] ) \cap \bigl[0 , \tfrac{1}{2} \bigr) 
&=
\bigl\{ x \in [ 0 , 1 ) 
%\; \rvert \; 
\bigm\vert
0 < x < \tfrac{1}{2} 
%\; , \; 
,\ x \in
  \bigl[ \tfrac{a}{2} , \tfrac{b}{2}\bigr] \bigr\}
= \bigl[ \tfrac{a}{2} , \tfrac{b}{2}\bigr] 
\\
\psi^{-1}( [ a , b ] ) \cap \bigl(\tfrac{1}{2} , 1 \bigr) 
&= 
\bigl\{ x \in [ 0 , 1 ) 
%\; \rvert \;
\bigm\vert
\tfrac{1}{2} < x < 1 
%\; , \; 
,\ x \in
  \bigl[ \tfrac{1+a}{2} , \tfrac{1+b}{2}\bigr] \bigr\}
= \bigl[ \tfrac{1+a}{2} , \tfrac{1+b}{2}\bigr]
\end{align*}
Hence $\mu\bigl(\psi^{-1}([a,b])\bigr) =
\mu\bigl( \bigl[\frac{a}{2} , \frac{b}{2} \bigr]\bigr)
+ \mu\bigl(\bigl[\frac{1+a}{2} , \frac{1+b}{2}\bigr] \bigr) 
= b- a = \mu([b,a])$.

\end{document}

Splitting fraction numerator into several lines

I'm not sure I understood your comments fully, but \splitfrac instructions can certainly be nested. Each instance of \splitfrac creates a linebreak; three nested \splitfrac directives, for instance, result in four lines overall.

The \mathstrut directives serve to insert a bit of extra vertical whitespace.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools} % for \splitfrac macro
\begin{document}
\[
 \frac{\splitfrac{2102 - 400 + 1873\mathstrut}{
       \splitfrac{{} - 400 + 1949 + 1800\mathstrut}{
       \splitfrac{{} - 400 + 1314 + 400\mathstrut}{ 
                   + 1473 + 1901 + 400\mathstrut}}}}{7}
\]
\end{document}

Best Answer

Related Solutions

Overleaf math mode misplacing bug

Splitting fraction numerator into several lines

Related Question