Each of the article type references causes ‘You can’t pop an empty literal stack’ error using BibTeX

bibtex

I have modified my question based on the commands of the first version (thank you). This is the question of version 2. I think I have located the problematic codes.

The problematic 'bst' file can be found in HERE, and a minimal 'bib' file can be found in THERE.

Usually, when receiving the error message 'You can't pop an empty literal stack for entry 5427079
while executing—line 1116 of file roblike.bst', it means the associated item in the file 'bib' is missing.

In this condition, it generates the following references and errors.

You can't pop an empty literal stack for entry 5427079
while executing—line 1119 of file roblike.bst

However, the error message is pointing to a useless code. The code in Line 1116 is ITERATE {call.type$}.

How can I know what is missing?

First attempt: find a way to track the BibTeX.

How to track the working of the BibTeX?
My first attempt is to find a way to run 'bst' file step by step.
From the comments of the first version, I think the answer is no. So, I turn to the code that is used to process the article type, it contains:

FUNCTION {article}
{ output.bibitem
  format.authors "author" output.check
  author format.key output                              % special for
  new.block
  format.title "title" output.check
  new.block
  crossref missing$
    { format.journals
      format.year.vol.num.pages output
    }
    { format.article.crossref output.nonnull
      format.pages output
    }
  if$
  new.block
  note output
  fin.entry
}

And, two associated functions:

FUNCTION {format.article.crossref}
{ "In"                                                  % this is for gmjlike
  " \cite{" * crossref * "}" *
}

FUNCTION {format.year.vol.num.pages}
{ 
  volume empty$
    { "empty volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
    { write$
      ", {\bf " volume * "}" * extra.label *
      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
    }
  if$
   number empty$
    'skip$
    { "(" number * ")" * *
      volume empty$
        { "there's a number but no volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
        'skip$
      if$
    }
  if$
  pages empty$
    'skip$
    { duplicate$ empty$
        { pop$ format.pages }
        { ", " * pages n.dashify * }
      if$
    }
  if$
  year empty$
    { "empty year in " cite$ * warning$ }
    { write$
      " (" year * ")" * extra.label *
      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
    }
  if$
}

with the entry 5427079 in the file bib:

@article{5427079,
    author = {Bioucas-Dias, Jos{\'e} M. and Figueiredo, M{\'a}rio A. T.},
    journal = {IEEE Transactions on Image Processing},
    number = {7},
    pages = {1720-1730},
    title = {Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization},
    volume = {19},
    year = {2010}}

I do not think I lost anything in that item.

Second attempt: I think I know where is wrong.

Since BibTeX cannot run step by step, I can guide the workflow by giving the proper test case.

I add a crossref item for 5427079 and reference with \cite{5427079} \cite{Rokach2010}, which leads to no error.

@article{5427079,
    author = {Bioucas-Dias, Jos{\'e} M. and Figueiredo, M{\'a}rio A. T.},
    journal = {IEEE Transactions on Image Processing},
    number = {7},
    pages = {1720-1730},
    title = {Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization},
    volume = {19},
    crossref = {Rokach2010},
    year = {2010}}

Warning--can't use both author and editor fields in Rokach2010
(There was 1 warning)
Process exited normally

That means the codes below are OK.

   { 
      format.article.crossref output.nonnull
      format.pages output
    }

so the problem is limited to the following codes.

{ 
  format.journals
  format.year.vol.num.pages output
}

Then, I remove the crossref item and reference the second line. The BibTeX reports no error, again.

    { 
      format.journals
 %     format.year.vol.num.pages output
    }

So, the problem lies in the following line.

 format.year.vol.num.pages output

Then, I restore the second line and reference the first line. The error occurs, again.

    { 
%      format.journals
      format.year.vol.num.pages output
    }

Then, I think the function format.year.vol.num.pages must be the problem. So, I reference everything inside. The function is empty!

FUNCTION {format.year.vol.num.pages}
{ 
%  volume empty$
%    { "empty volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
%    { write$
%      ", {\bf " volume * "}" * extra.label *
%      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
%    }
%  if$
%   number empty$
%    'skip$
%    { "(" number * ")" * *
%      volume empty$
%        { "there's a number but no volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
%        'skip$
%      if$
%    }
%  if$
%  pages empty$
%    'skip$
%    { duplicate$ empty$
%        { pop$ format.pages }
%        { ", " * pages n.dashify * }
%      if$
%    }
%  if$
%  year empty$
%    { "empty year in " cite$ * warning$ }
%    { write$
%      " (" year * ")" * extra.label *
%      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
%    }
%  if$
}

The problem remains! Strange!

You can't pop an empty literal stack for entry 5427079
while executing---line 1119 of file roblike.bst

Best Answer

The .bst file has several issues.

I think I could isolate the problem that caused the specific error you asked about in the question, but the code I saw did not inspire confidence that this was the only problem with this .bst file.

The fact that the .bst language is stack-based and uses reverse Polish notation can make things tricky to follow.

You have already identified the problematic bits of code: The functions format.journals and format.year.vol.num.pages.

format.journals is defined as

FUNCTION {format.journals}
{ journal empty$
    { "" }
    { journal emphasize "," * "journal" output.check }
  if$
}

Assuming you have a journal in your @article entry, this leaves the stack empty, because output.check writes out the first item on the stack and then removes it.

Unfortunately, if the journal is empty, the function pushes an empty string to the stack. So the behaviour is vastly different in that case.

Indeed, if you remove the journal from your example entry, BibTeX compiles without an error message, but the output is completely garbage.

If you look at the output that BibTeX produces despite the error if there is a journal you see that it contains two commas, one of those is added by this function, so we can remove the comma here. This allows us to simplify the function to the following

FUNCTION {format.journals}
{ journal emphasize "journal" output.check }

which, incidentally is exactly what apalike.bst does (it just doesn't define a function for it).

format.year.vol.num.pages is defined as

FUNCTION {format.year.vol.num.pages}
{ 
  volume empty$
    { "empty volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
    { write$
      ", {\bf " volume * "}" * extra.label *
      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
    }
  if$
   number empty$
    'skip$
    { "(" number * ")" * *
      volume empty$
        { "there's a number but no volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
        'skip$
      if$
    }
  if$
  pages empty$
    'skip$
    { duplicate$ empty$
        { pop$ format.pages }
        { ", " * pages n.dashify * }
      if$
    }
  if$
  year empty$
    { "empty year in " cite$ * warning$ }
    { write$
      " (" year * ")" * extra.label *
      mid.sentence 'output.state :=
    }
  if$
}

Again, the function can leave the stack in different states depending on which conditional path was taken.

If there is no volume, the function just issues a warning and otherwise leaves the stack alone.

If there is a volume, the function first pops one item from the stack and writes it and then adds more stuff to the stack. Since format.journals leaves the stack empty, this will give an error.

Something similar is done for year.

The way the function is set up means that all conditionals should just push their contents onto the stack and concatenate it so that at the end there is one long string on the stack that can be written out.

Additionally, the functions seem to mention extra.label in random places and set output.state for seemingly no reason. Fixing this and another comma gives us

FUNCTION {format.year.vol.num.pages}
{ 
  volume empty$
    { 
      "empty volume in " cite$ * warning$
      ""
    }
    { 
      "{\bf " volume * "}" *
    }
  if$
  number empty$
    'skip$
    { "(" number * ")" * *
      volume empty$
        { "there's a number but no volume in " cite$ * warning$ }
        'skip$
      if$
    }
  if$
  pages empty$
    'skip$
    { duplicate$ empty$
        { pop$ format.pages }
        { ", " * pages n.dashify * }
      if$
    }
  if$
  year empty$
    { "empty year in " cite$ * warning$ }
    { 
      " (" year * extra.label * ")" * *
    }
  if$
}

Fixing the two functions as shown here lets the example compile fine again. But there might be more errors.

It should be noted that the .bst file is based quite heavily on apalike.bst (all mentions of apalike are replaced by gmjlike), which is an author-year style. The style in its current form does not provide author-year data and can thus only be used as a numeric style. But numeric styles should calculate the longest label for correct indentation in the bibliography, which apalike does not have to do. This means that this style produces misaligned bibliographies.

I strongly recommend you stop using this style or you get in touch with the developer or distributor of the style immediately to tell them about these issues.

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] elsarticle error: You can’t pop an empty literal stack for entry

It looks like there is a duplicate line in elsarticle-num.bst which is trying to use an item from the stack which isn't there anymore. I think that the function misc (line 1360 of elsarticle-num.bst), which looks like this:

FUNCTION {misc}
{ output.bibitem
  format.authors output
  title empty$ 'skip$ 'setup.inlinelink if$ % urlbst
  format.title output
  howpublished output
  format.note output
    format.date "year" output.check
  fin.entry
    format.date "year" output.check
  write.url
  empty.misc.check
}

should have the second format.date "year" output.check removed:

FUNCTION {misc}
{ output.bibitem
  format.authors output
  title empty$ 'skip$ 'setup.inlinelink if$ % urlbst
  format.title output
  howpublished output
  format.note output
    format.date "year" output.check
  fin.entry
%    format.date "year" output.check <-- Remove/comment this
  write.url
  empty.misc.check
}

[Tex/LaTex] BibTeX You can’t pop an empty literal stack for entry XXXXXX

There are several problems in myplain.bst mostly in relation to the date and series field. Please report this as a bug to the maintainer/developer of your template. If there is no one maintaining the template you should seriously consider not using the template and/or protesting if you are required to use it. It is unreasonable to require people to use an unsupported and broken template.

The main problem is that in

day " " * month * " " * year *

in format.date there is no check if day actually exists. At that point we have checked for month and year, but not for day. I added a test.

There are also some other problems with string concatenation that aren't uniform across branches in tests.

The other changes are to make the warnings work properly.

--- myplain-orig.bst    2020-07-14 19:03:34.384191800 +0200
+++ myplain.bst 2020-07-14 19:42:29.166464000 +0200
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@
 FUNCTION {format.date}
 { year empty$
     { month empty$
-        { "" }
-            { day empty$
-                { "" }
-                { "there's a day but no year and month in " cite$ warning$ day
-                }
-              if$
+        { day empty$
+            { "" }
+            { "there's a day but no year and month in " cite$ * warning$
+              day
             }
+          if$
+        }
         { "there's a month but no year in " cite$ * warning$
           month
         }
@@ -281,12 +281,17 @@
     }
     { month empty$
         { day empty$
-            { month " " * year * }
-            { "there's a day but no month in " cite$ warning$ day
+            { year }
+            { "there's a day but no month in " cite$ * warning$
+              day " " * year *
             }
           if$
         }
-        { day " " * month * " " * year * }
+        { day empty$
+            { "" }
+            { day " " * }
+          if$
+          month * " " * year * }
       if$
     }
   if$
@@ -349,8 +354,8 @@
     {""}
     { year empty$
         { "" }
-        { " (" * series * " " * year * ")" * }
-        if$
+        { " (" series * " " * year * ")" * }
+      if$
     }
   if$
 }
@@ -365,25 +370,21 @@
 FUNCTION {format.year}
 { year empty$
     { "" }
-    { " (" * year * ")" *}
-    if$
+    { " (" year * ")" *}
+  if$
 }
 
-
-
 FUNCTION {format.month}
 { month empty$
     { "" }
-    {month}
-        
+    { month }
    if$
 }
 
 FUNCTION {format.day}
 { day empty$
     { "" }
-    {day}
-        
+    { day }
    if$
 }