Electromagnetism – Why is Current Density Constant in a Conductor of Uniform Cross Section?

conductorselectric-currentelectricityelectromagnetismpotential

According to what I was taught, if current was dispersed “uniformly,” current density would remain constant.
So, in a conductor, the 'current density should be the same at all points.' But, given that electrons flow at random (their time between collisions differs from that of other electrons), how can current density be the same everywhere?

Every electron's drift velocity is different. And I am not talking about the average drift velocity here. Rather, specific drift velocities.

An electron's drift velocity differs from that of other electrons, so the j vector should differ as well, right?

Why, then, is the j vector the same everywhere?

I believe I am missing something crucial.

Please correct me and explain your reasoning.

EDIT:

Please review the changes.

I get that we're smoothing out the fluctuations by averaging current densities, but the actual question is, "Are there any fluctuations at all in reality?" or "Are current densities truly different at all points?" (If the electric field is consistent)

This is because the equation

Eσ = J*

(E=electric field,σ – conductivity, j=current density)

implies that if E is uniform (the same at all points of the conductor), then J is uniform at all "points."
As a result, the last question is —

How is this possible that j has the same value at each position when each electron's drift velocity varies(as time between two subsequent collision varies) ?

OR

How can q in j= q/(Δt*dA) be the same at all places for a given amount of time Δt and very small area dA(point),where q is charge crossing that point?

Please assist me in resolving my confusion.

Best Answer

A uniform current density $\vec{J}$ is just as much an abstraction as a uniform charge density $\rho$.

Even if a "real" charge density $\rho$ is made up of a bunch of different point charges at discrete points in space, averaging the charge over a sufficiently large volume (which is still going to be pretty small on macroscopic scales) will let us think of it as being approximately uniform so we can solve problems about it using Gauss's Law & the like.

Similarly, even if a "real" current density $\vec{J}$ is made up of many different electrons with different speeds, we can define an averaged current density by looking at the amount of charge per time that crosses a particular surface over a particular period of time, and defining the magnitude of $\vec{J}$ to be $Q/(\Delta A \Delta t)$. This averages out all the microscopic fluctuations in current that you're worried about and lets us treat $\vec{J}$ as nice and uniform on larger scales.

The situation is analogous to water in a pipe or an air current, where on a microscopic level the density is not uniform and the molecular velocities vary according to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution with a small additional "drift" velocity. Moreover, as with water flows and current flows, the current density $\vec{J}$ doesn't have to be uniform in space or in time; it can vary over space or time either in a "microscopic sense" or in a "macroscopic sense" (think of turbulent water flow or a storm with gusts of wind.) The only reason you usually see uniform $\vec{J}$ in introductory E&M classes is that it makes the calculations easier for beginning students.

Similarly, the equation $\vec{E} = \sigma \vec{J}$ (which applies inside a conductor) is an equation that really only applies to an "averaged" electric field. In general, when we talk about the electric field "inside a medium", we are really referring to the average of an electric field over some volume that is large compared to the size of the molecules that comprise it. This issue is discussed briefly in §4.2.3 of Griffith's Introduction to Electrodynamics, in the context of linear dielectrics.

Related Question