The charged current part of the Lagrangian of the electoweak interaction, for the first generation of leptons, is :
$$L_c = \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar \nu_L \gamma^\mu e_L W^+_\mu + \bar e_L \gamma^\mu \nu_L W^-_\mu )$$
The first part corresponds to different versions of the same vertex :
$e_L + W^+ \leftrightarrow \nu_L \tag{1a}$
$(\bar\nu)_R + W^+ \leftrightarrow(\bar e)_R \tag{1b}$
$W^+ \leftrightarrow (\bar e)_R +\nu_L \tag{1c}$
The second part corresponds to different versions of the hermitian congugate vertex :
$\nu_L + W^- \leftrightarrow e_L \tag{2a}$
$ (\bar e)_R + W^- \leftrightarrow(\bar \nu)_R \tag{2b}$
$W^- \leftrightarrow e_L +(\bar \nu)_R \tag{2c}$
Here, $(\bar e)_R$ and $(\bar\nu)_R$ are the anti-particle of $e_L$ and $\nu_L$
Roughly speaking, you can change the side of a particle relatively to the $\leftrightarrow$, if you take the anti-particle.
Why the right-handed particles appear ? The fundamental reason is that we cannot separate particles and anti-particles, for instance, we cannot separate the creation of a particle and the destruction of an anti-particle.
[EDIT]
(Precisions due to OP comments)
The quantized Dirac field may be written :
$$\psi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^\frac{3}{2} (\frac{E_p}{m})^\frac{1}{2}}~\sum_s(b(p,s) u(p,s)e^{-ip.x} + d^+(p,s) v(p,s)e^{+ip.x} )$$
$$\psi^*(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^\frac{3}{2} (\frac{E_p}{m})^\frac{1}{2}}~\sum_s(b^+(p,s) \bar u(p,s)e^{+ip.x} + d(p,s) \bar v(p,s)e^{-ip.x} )$$
Here, the $u$ and $v$ are spinors corresponding to particle and anti-particle, the $b$ and $b^+$ are particle creation and anihilation operators, the $d$ and $d^+$ are anti-particle creation and anihilation operators.
We see, that in Fourier modes of the Dirac quantized field, the elementary freedom degree is (below $p$ and $s$ are fixed):
$$b(p,s) u(p,s)e^{-ip.x} + d^+(p,s) v(p,s)e^{+ip.x}$$
Now, suppose we are considering massless particles, so that helicity and chirality are the same thing. Suppose that, for the particle (spinor $u(p,s)$) the couple $s,p$ corresponds to some helicity. We see, that, for the anti-particle ($v$), there is a term $e^{+ip.x}$ instead of $e^{-ip.x}$ for the particle. That means that the considered momentum is $-p$ for the anti-particle, while the considered momentum is $p$ for the particle. The momenta are opposed for a same $s$, so it means that the helicities are opposed.
You are correct that for a massive spinor, helicity is not Lorentz invariant. For a massless spinor, helicity is Lorentz invariant and coincides with chirality. Chirality is always Lorentz invariant.
Helicity defined
$$
\hat h = \vec\Sigma \cdot \hat p,
$$
commutes with the Hamiltonian,
$$
[\hat h, H] = 0,
$$
but is clearly not Lorentz invariant, because it contains a dot product of a three-momentum.
Chirality defined
$$
\gamma_5 = i\gamma_0 \ldots \gamma_3,
$$
is Lorentz invariant, but does not commute with the Hamiltonian,
$$
[\gamma_5, H] \propto m
$$
because a mass term mixes chirality, $m\bar\psi_L\psi_R$. If $m=0$, you can show from the massless Dirac equation that $\gamma_5 = \hat h$ when acting on a spinor.
Your second answer is closest to the truth:
The weak interaction couples only with left chiral spinors and is not frame/observer dependent.
A left chiral spinor can be written
$$
\psi_L = \frac12 (1+\gamma_5) \psi.
$$
If $m=0$, the left and right chiral parts of a spinor are independent. They obey separate Dirac equations.
If $m\neq0$, the mass states $\psi$,
$$
m(\bar\psi_R \psi_L + \bar\psi_L \psi_R) = m\bar\psi\psi\\
\psi = \psi_L + \psi_R
$$
are not equal to the interaction states, $\psi_L$ and $\psi_R$. There is a single Dirac equation for $\psi$ that is not separable into two equations of motion (one for $\psi_R$ and one for $\psi_L$).
If an electron, say, is propagating freely, it is a mass eigenstate, with both left and right chiral parts propagating.
Best Answer
I think you are sort of reversing the logic of chirality and helicity in the massless limit. Chirality defines which representation of the lorentz group your Weyl spinors transform in. It doesn't 'become' helicity, helicity 'becomes' chirality in the massless limit. That is, chirality is what it is, and it defines a representation of a group and that can't change. This other thing we have defined called helicity just happens to be the same thing in a particular limit.
Now once you take the massless limit the Weyl fermions are traveling at the speed of light you can no longer boost to a frame that switches the helicity. I think its best to think of a fermion mass term as an interaction in this case and remember that the massive term of a Dirac fermion is a bunch of left and right- handed Weyl guys bumping up into one another along the way. Conversely if you want to talk about a full massive Dirac fermion that travels less than c and you can boost to change the helicity, but that full Dirac fermion isn't the thing carrying weak charge, only a 'piece' of it is.
See this blog post on helicity and chirality.
As far as the left-right symmetry being broken people have certainly built models along these lines but I don't think they have worked out.
Does this answer your question?