Usually the GW Density Functional Theory (DFT) gives larger band gaps in semiconductors compared to the LDA and GGA methods. This seems to be related to the screened potential in GW, but it is not clear to me how.
[Physics] Why does GW-DFT give higher bandgaps in semiconductors
approximationscomputational physicsdensity-functional-theory
Related Solutions
which functional gives close value to the experimentally observed band gap of semiconductors
Different functionals are accurate under different circumstances, so you can't make a blanket statement that one functional gives accurate band gaps for semiconductors. The only way to know when various functionals are and are not trustworthy is to use them in order to become familiar with their strengths and limitations. Personally I suggest to choose a small number of well known functionals (I use PBE and B3LYP) and stick to those unless you know why some other functional is more appropriate for a given situation.
What about the HOMO-LUMO gap? Can we use HOMO-LUMO gap (for non-periodic structures) instead of the gap observed in density of states?
The band gap in periodic systems is the continuous version of the HOMO-LUMO gap for molecular systems, so there's no using one instead of the other. If you're asking whether the HOMO-LUMO gap of an isolated molecule is similar to the band gap for an atomic or molecular crystal, the answer is no, they're often totally different.
This is an important question that is asked by many people entering the field of density functional theory. I think that it should be answered with a high degree of detail and thus I would like to add a few aspects to the answer of supermarche.
As mentioned the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem states that (up to a constant energy shift) the external potential of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation to the many-body Hamiltonian is a unique functional of the ground-state charge density. This implies that this Hamiltionian itself is a functional of the ground-state density and therefore in theory not only ground-state properties of the investigated system are encoded in the ground-state density but also excited-state properties. I mention that this is in theory the case as for practical investigations only for very few properties functionals are known that extract the respective quantities from the density.
It is well known (see, e.g., L. J. Sham, M. Schlüter: Density-Functional Theory of the Energy Gap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)) that the fundamental band gap for a system with $N$ electrons is given by the differences of ground-state total energies of systems with deviating numbers of electrons as $$E_g = (E_{N+1} - E_N) - (E_N - E_{N-1})$$ Thus being able to calculate the ground-state total energy for these different systems should be enough to calculate the band gap. Leaving aside the issue of the approximation to the exchange-correlation (xc) functional the ground-state total energy is accessible by density functional theory but this does not imply that the band gap of the Kohn-Sham system is the fundamental gap of the interacting-electron system.
Let us assume fractional particle numbers and take a closer look at the energy and its dependence on the number of electrons. It is known that this dependence qualitatively behaves as sketched in the following figure:
The exact xc functional connects the total energies for integer particle numbers by straight lines and features derivative discontinuities $\Delta^{xc}$ at integer particle numbers. The local density approximation (LDA) on the other hand shows a smooth behavior.
Based on the equation for the fundamental band gap given above we can derive another expression for the exact xc functional: $$E_g = \lim_{\eta \rightarrow 0^+} \left\lbrace \left.\frac{\delta E[n]}{\delta n(\boldsymbol{r})}\right|_{N+\eta} - \left.\frac{\delta E[n]}{\delta n(\boldsymbol{r})}\right|_{N-\eta} \right\rbrace$$ where $n(\boldsymbol{r})$ is the density.
By plugging in Janak's theorem $\partial E / \partial n_i = \epsilon_i$ and the derivative discontinuity one ends up with $$E_g = \epsilon_{N+1} - \epsilon_{N} + \Delta_N^{xc}$$ where $\epsilon_i$ denotes the energy of i-th electron state in the Kohn-Sham system.
Detailed derivations of this result are provided in, e.g., J. P. Perdew, M. Levy: Physical Content of the Exact Kohn-Sham Orbital Energies: Band Gaps and Derivative Discontinuities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1884 (1983) or E. Engel, R. M. Dreizler: Density Functional Theory - An Advanced Course, Springer (2011).
The essence of this result is that even with the exact xc functional the Kohn-Sham band structure does not provide the fundamental band gap of the real interacting-electron system as it does not include the finite and positive derivative discontinuity.
- Local and semilocal approximations to the xc functional like LDA or GGAs do not feature the discussed derivative discontinuities. But one can provide a simple hand-waving reason why the band structure underestimates the gap in this case.
One contribution to the energy of the Kohn-Sham system is the Hartree energy $$E_H[n] = \frac{1}{2} \int \frac{n(\boldsymbol{r}) n(\boldsymbol{r}')}{|\boldsymbol{r} - \boldsymbol{r}'|} d^3 r d^3 r'.$$ By considering a simple single-electron system like the hydrogen atom it is obvious that this energy contribution implies an unphysical self-interaction of the electron with itself.
This self-interaction has to be compensated by the xc energy but unfortunately an exact cancellation is not possible with local and semilocal xc functionals. A part of this unphysical energy contribution therefore remains and pushes the energies of the occupied states upwards. If a state is not occupied it does not contribute to the density and therefore there is no self-interaction for such states.
The band gap separates the occupied from the unoccupied states. Since the occupied states are lower in energy this implies a reduction of the gap.
Best Answer
The standard DFT (LDA & GGA) could not properly capture the exchange-correlation of a quantum system being investigated, it sort of lacks interaction/quantum property resulting to smaller gaps (inaccurate result in other words).
A better method that will give bigger gaps (closely accurate results/closer to experiments) should be performed. This is why we perform GW approximation.
GW approximation give a more accurate picture of band gaps (larger than LDA & GGA) largely from the nature of its solution. Typically, band gap materials requires solving the non-inhomogeneous differential equation (Time Dependent Schrodinger equation). GW properly handles this by employing a Green's function method. Further solving this we can obtain the:
None of this is implemented by the standard DFT (LDA & GGA). We could not attribute the accuracy of GW to a certain variable or term but rather to the METHOD.
NOTE:
You may consult the references below regarding the relevant equations.
Interaction/quantum property within exchange-correlation may involve electron-electron interaction, electron screening/shielding, electron-electron repulsion, electron-spin interaction, decoupling, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GW_approximation
www.tddft.org/bmg/files/seminarios/127407.pdf
benasque.org/2012tddft/talks_contr/049_12benasque_gw.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_functional_theory