[Physics] Why are there no stable isotopes with an atomic mass of 5 or 8

binding-energyelementsisotopesneutronsnuclear-physics

One of the things I've encountered in my travels is the mass-5 roadblock. Rod Nave writes about it on his excellent educational hyperphysics website:

enter image description here

The helium-4 nucleus or alpha particle with a mass of 4 is particularly stable. But there are no is stable isotope with a mass of 5. Helium-5 isn't stable, nor is lithium-5. They decay almost immediately. Lithium-6 however is stable, but it has a lower binding energy than helium-4, which sounds relevant. Something else that sounds relevant is that lithium-7 is stable too but lithium-8 is not, and nor is beryllium-8, or boron-8. The $64,000 question is why?

Why are there no stable isotopes with an atomic mass of 5 or 8?

Best Answer

The extreme stability of He-4.

Look at the decay modes of the the eights and they produce two alphas and if it is necessary convert a neutron/proton to a proton/neutron with an appropriate beta decay.
The production of two alphas is energetically favourable.

Li-6 and Li-7 lack nucleons to form two alphas.

Li-5 kicks out a proton and He-5 kicks out a neutron to form He-4.

More about 5 in LubošMotl's answer.