[Physics] Which would melt faster on the sidewalk, equal volumes of snow or ice

everyday-lifeicethermal conductivitythermodynamics

Whilst walking back from class, I noticed the piled snow on the sides of the street still hadn't melted after a week despite it being sunny and generally warm $(15°C-18°C)$. "If that snow was ice, surely it would've melted away by now", I thought. I couldn't figure out what would melt faster on the sidewalk; the piled snow that was somewhat impacted, or the same volume filled by solid ice at the same temperature.

enter image description here

My thought-process was that the snow had pockets of air acting as very good insulators that would slow heat transfer even though the solid ice has a "bigger tank" for heat and needs more of it to fully melt. Ice is a much more solid structure though, allowing for far better heat conduction (via microscopic vibration) and has more of itself in contact with the ground. Snow is also shinier than ice, reflecting more sunlight. I know that there are several types of snow and this one is packed powder, with a crust that can support someone walking over it but crumbles if stomped on. The inner parts are powdery and the edges are coarse, crunchy and wet. How dirty the snow is also plays a part (since dirt has a much lower heat capacity than ice and absorbs radiation better).

This is a close-up of the snow.
This is a close-up

Would replacing that volume with solid ice at the same temperature last longer than the snow ? My intuition says the snow would last longer but I don't know which contributing factor dominates.

Best Answer

The density of snow is much lower than the density of ice - so the total heat of fusion needed to melt a volume of snow is much lower. That will mean the snow melts faster than the ice.

The air in the snow does lower the thermal conductivity - but that just means that the little heat from the air can melt the outer layer of snow without having to worry about the effect of snow "deeper inside".

In my experience a significant factor in snow melting is the presence of dirt - small dark particles that absorb energy from sunlight. "Clean" snow reflects much of the sun's power while clean (solid) ice will absorb a larger fraction of it. This is a factor that matters more for snow in the presence of sunlight - it doesn't affect snow in the shade where only the heat from the air plays a role- and that is what I believe you were asking about.