Here are some questions to ask before building equations:
What is the shape of the bowl?
What is the mathematical description of the shape of the bowl?
Is the bowl massless?
How does the bowl swing? Does it swing from a string? Is that string massless?
Does the bowl rotate? (in addition to its swinging and having a ball roll on its surface)
From a related question, "Consider a solid ball of radius $r$ and mass $m$ rolling without slipping in a hemispherical bowl of radius $R$ (simple back and forth motion). "
"The only torque acting on the ball at any point in its motion is the friction force $f$. So we can write
$\tau = I\alpha = fr$
again using the rolling condition $a = r\alpha$ and the moment of inertia for a solid sphere,
$\frac{2}{5}ma = f$
The net force acting on the system is the tangential component of gravity and the force of friction, so
$F = ma = mgsin\theta - f$ "
Since your bowl is swinging, $\theta $ changes with time.
(Imagine the bowl is like a swinging pendulum bob)
Now lets discuss the details about the swinging bowl.
Consider a swinging bowl on a massless string of length $L'$ with period of oscillation $T'$ and maximum angular displacement $\theta_{max} '$
We need to form equations describing the change of the angle on inclination of the bowl with respect to the rolling bowl as the bowl swings.
Therefore, we need some initial condition. Let's say the bowl is at its maximum angular displacement to our 'left', and the hemispherical bowl always 'points' towards the 'axis' of it's swinging. Our 'total' inclination angle must not sum up to $\frac{\pi}{2} rad$, otherwise the ball would fall vertically instead of rolling without slipping.
First off, let's deal with $\theta$, the angle of inclination. Angle of inclination=angle of ball in bowl + angle of bowl in pendulum system.
Secondly, we need the equation describing the change of $\theta $ with time. Assume the bowl is massless but rigid and doesn't rotate (due to the other torque, exerted by the ball on the bowl). However, for a short while, let's imagine that the bowl does rotate. We would have some critical case (or range of cases) such that the rotation of the bowl corresponds to the swinging of the bowl in such a way that we can have large maximum angular displacements for the swinging of the bowl (perhaps even $2 \pi$, corresponding to full revolutions!). In other words, the rotation of the bowl could help increase the stability of the system.
If the bowl rotates, we need to even information about the bowl.
So in the oscillation of the bowl, we only consider the mass of the ball.
First things first, Torque is always relative to a given point. You can calculate the torque about the centre of mass or about the point of contact.
Next, Any object, moving howsoever, can be analysed in one definite way, by considering the pure translational motion of the Centre of mass and the pure rotation of the body about the centre of mass. (This is true because in the COM reference frame, the pseudo-forces due to the rotating create torques which are balanced about the axis passing through centre of mass.) Therefore, you can treat the rolling wheel as a translation of the centre of mass +the rotation about the centre of mass. There is another way to treat a moving body. It can be treated as a pure rotational motion about an axis called Instantaneous Axis Of Rotation(IAOR). In your case of the rolling wheel, the IAOR passes through the point of contact of the wheel with the incline. Moreover, the $\omega$ for rotation about IAOR is the same as the rotation about COM in your case.
Let us use the first method to analyse your case. The forces acting are:-
1)$F_g$ which acts through the centre of mass and hence can provide no torque for the rotation.
2)$N$ or the normal reaction which again passes through COM and hence produces no torque.
3)The only force that can provide any torque is the friction $f$.
Now, all of these can accelerate the centre of mass. But in the direction perpendicular to the incline, all forces are balanced and there is no acceleration. Along the incline, the translational acceleration is $a=\frac{F_g\sin\theta-f}{m}$. To find the friction, remember, friction tries to prevent relative motion. It can do so by making the rolling a pure rolling. Here the point of contact is (momentarily) stationary and hence no relative motion. for pure rolling, $v=\omega R$ and $a=\alpha R$ must hold true. From this $\alpha=\frac{fR}{I}$, where $I$ is the moment of inertia about COM axis, $R$ the radius and $\alpha$ the angular acceleration. This determines all the variables with $I$.
Using IAOR in your analysis, the torques change but the physical quantities $a$ and $speed$ remain the same. You can try that out for yourself.
Best Answer
I think that if you spin "perfectly" (i.e., such that the rotational axis is normal to the surface and goes through he centre of the coin), is only a rotation movement with friction. This motion is unstable though, so, the axis tilt a little bit and this cause a rotation in the axis itself, the precession. The point of contact will be moving with the precession, maybe you can calculate its position by geometrical arguments, although it should be a circular/spiral/cycloid movement (if you see in the coin a movement towards a given direction, this is solely because of the way you made if spin or the coin or because the table has a tilt or imperfections).
I don't know your level of knowledge, but for a complete description you need knowledge of Hamiltonian dynamics, rigid body and Euler angles, so basically a course of classical (a.k.a. analytical) mechanics. A very common, related, problem is the problem of the spinning top, the difference here is that the contact point is material, so there you have to see if you have to see if the contact point slips or not (if not, it creates a rotation in the axis normal to the coin).
Personally I think that it is a complicated but somehow treatable problem (with a lot of patience).