[Physics] So Universe Expansion is accelerating, it already did with the Big Bang, so what came in-between

Question

So scientists are finding that the Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.
It is said 'Dark Energy' is the cause. Ok.
But the Universe expanded at a reaally accelerated rate just after the Big Bang too!
Presumably at a faster rate then 'now' (whatever time the observations stem from)

So, in-between 'now' and the Big Bang it must have slowed down no? Or else the universe would currently be expanding at an even faster rate than at the Big Bang.

So what happened in-between?
If 'current' expansion is really caused by this Dark Energy, why wasn't that in effect in the in-between time?
What was going on then?

Shouldn't we be able to measure the expansion at different eras/ages?

Cheers!

Answer 1

The expansion of the Universe is driven by the dominant forms of energy and matter density. This is essentially an expression of a famous statement by John Wheeler (from memory, apologies if I get the exact wording wrong): "Spacetime tells matter how to move, matter tells spacetime how to curve". In this case, the matter is telling the Universe how to expand. Mathematically, Einstein's equations describing gravity, when restricted to homogeneous and isotropic Universes (relevant for cosmology), reduce to the Friedmann equations which relate the expansion rate to the matter content.

There are lots of different kinds of energy density, but for cosmology there (to zeroth order) three that really matter:

• When the Universe is dominated by non-relativistic matter (atoms and molecules but also dark matter), the size of the Universe grows with time as approximately $\sim t^{2/3}$.
• When the Universe is dominated by relativistic matter (such as photons or a very hot gas of particles moving relativistically), the Universe grows as $\sim t^{1/2}$.
• When the Universe is dominated by an approximately constant energy density (more on this in a minute), the Universe grows exponentially as $\sim e^{Ht}$, where $H$ is the expansion rate.

Note that ordinary matter (relativistic and non-relativistic) do not have a constant energy density. As the Universe expands, the energy density (energy per unit volume) goes down, because there are the same number of particles but a larger volume. (Well, it can be that the number of particles changes, but at the level of this discussion that's a detail that is not so important, the key thing is that the energy per unit volume decreases for ordinary matter).

So something weird is needed in order to provide constant energy density as the Universe expands. Physically we can imagine that there is a certain amount of energy associated with every volume of space -- then as space expands, in a sense creating more space, there is also more energy associated with that space. This is essentially the cosmological constant. Another possibility is that there is a dynamical field (a "scalar field") which permeates space, and an associated potential energy that is approximately the same anywhere.

With all that background, the current generally accepted model of cosmology is that:

1. The energy density is initially dominated in some scalar field, whose large potential energy permeates space and causes exponential expansion.
2. The scalar field rolls down its potential, and eventually rolls to an area of its potential where its potential energy is very small. During this process, the scalar field transfers its energy to ordinary matter and radiation fields.
3. The Universe enters a phase where it is dominated by relativistic, hot matter.
4. Eventually the Universe cools to a point where the matter that dominates the energy budget is non-relativistic, so the growth rate changes.
5. As the Universe cools even further, and its energy density lowers, eventually the energy density of the Universe becomes dominated by a small constant value that was likely present all along, but (up until recently) was only a negligible contribution to the overall budget. This last component is what was discovered in the late 90s as the accelerated expansion of the Universe.

While this is sort of a standard picture, not all points are on equally solid footing. The first two bullet points are not universally accepted. The first bullet point is called "inflation", and (if true) explains why the Universe we see is spatially flat, and why we observe the CMB to be at the same temperature, even though the different patches that make up the CMB were not in causal contact with each other before the Big Bang in models without inflation. The inflationary period also explains the origin of the spectrum of the CMB. The second bullet point is a mysterious process that is thought to involve some combination of the decay of scalar particles into other matter ("reheating") or some dynamical process where the scalar field coherently pumps energy into other fields ("preheating").

Points 3-5, however, are on quite solid observational footing. We have observations throughout the Universe's history that probe the Universe during these different eras. While we do not fully understand what is driving the Universe today, a perfectly satisfactory model that explains all the observations is that there is a very small constant energy density that has always been pervading the Universe throughout its entire history, but we are only seeing it now because we had to wait until the Universe became dilute enough to see its effects.