[Physics] Proof that the electric field is conservative

conservation-lawselectric-fieldselectrostaticshomework-and-exerciseswork

I was told a proof that the electric field was conservative (without using $\nabla$) which used a point charge and showed the following:

$$w.d.=\int_c{\vec F \cdot \mathrm{d} \vec l}=\int_c{\vec F\cos(\theta) \mathrm{d} l}$$
where $c$ is a path from a to b and $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec F$ and $\mathrm{d}\vec l$. In the case of a point charge it can be shown that in the limit (i.e. the limit of small elements of path getting infinitesimal) we have $dr=cos(\theta)dl$ where $dr$ is the radial distance from the point charge. It is now this next step that I have problems with, every where I have seen this proof they do the following:

$$\int^{r_b}_{r_a}{F\cos(\theta)\mathrm{d}r}$$
This is no longer a line integral, why?
(they then go onto say that this is path independent and there the force is conservative). So why have we suddenly jumped from a line integral to not a line integral. (a specific and general reason would be appreciated)

Here is a link to the proof.

Best Answer

So why have we suddenly jumped from a line integral to not a line integral

For a point charge, the electric field has a radial component only

$$\mathbf E = \frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat{\mathbf r}$$

Thus, the dot product of the electric field and the infinitesimal displacement vector is

$$\mathbf E \cdot d\mathbf l = \frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat{\mathbf r}\cdot \left( dr\;\hat{\mathbf r} + r\;d\theta \; \hat{\boldsymbol {\theta}} + r\;\sin \theta \;d\phi \;\hat{\boldsymbol{ \phi}}\right) = \frac{kQ}{r^2}\;dr$$

so, only displacement in the radial direction contributes to the line integral.

If the start and end radial coordinates are the same, the line integral is zero.

Related Question