Water known as the fire extinguisher.What is the possibility watere being the fuel to fire.
"Pure water"
Best Answer
What is the possibility water being the fuel to fire.
"Pure water"
Especially your emphatic addition of "Pure water" allows to answer this question in the narrow sense of the question as: 'No'.
In order for a substance to be the fuel to a fire it has to contain something that is reducible, i.e. capable of lowering its Oxidation Number. Such a substance is known as an oxidiser. Molecular oxygen ($\mathrm{O_2}$) is an archetypical oxidiser because its elemental oxidation number of $0$ can be lowered in chemical reactions.
But in water, oxygen is already at its lowest quantum mechanically allowed oxidation number, specifically $-2$. It cannot be lowered any further.
Water can contribute to a fire through other reactions like the reaction of water with reactive metals (like alkali metals, magnesium and others), which generates flammable hydrogen ($\mathrm{H_2}$) but that's not really the water itself contributing to the fire but the rather hydrogen catching fire.
if the electrolyte is not removed you will indeed get a buildup that will stop conduction (assuming there is no conventive or other mixing within your cell). However bearing in mind that 1 amp is $10^{-5}$ (ish) moles of electrons per second it will take a while.
In your example sodium gets reduced at the cathode then reacts with the water to produce hydrogen and sodium hydroxide. If it was silver nitrate the silver would be plated on the cathode and removed from solution.
I must admit that I have never noticed this, and indeed it runs somewhat contrary to what I would expect.
It's a suggestion rather than an answer, but when the heat is high there will be a strong updraught of hot air so is it possible that the steam is being carried away from the pan before it has a chance to condense to water droplets? Indeed if the air flow is fast enough the steam might never condense because it would be diluted into the surrounding air before droplet nucleation happened.
By contrast at very low heat the air flow around the pan is slow so the water vapour has plenty of time to condense and form visible droplets.
Best Answer
Especially your emphatic addition of "Pure water" allows to answer this question in the narrow sense of the question as: 'No'.
In order for a substance to be the fuel to a fire it has to contain something that is reducible, i.e. capable of lowering its Oxidation Number. Such a substance is known as an oxidiser. Molecular oxygen ($\mathrm{O_2}$) is an archetypical oxidiser because its elemental oxidation number of $0$ can be lowered in chemical reactions.
But in water, oxygen is already at its lowest quantum mechanically allowed oxidation number, specifically $-2$. It cannot be lowered any further.
Water can contribute to a fire through other reactions like the reaction of water with reactive metals (like alkali metals, magnesium and others), which generates flammable hydrogen ($\mathrm{H_2}$) but that's not really the water itself contributing to the fire but the rather hydrogen catching fire.
Water itself can certainly not burn.