I know outside a nucleus, neutrons are unstable and they have half life of about 15 minutes. But when they are together with protons inside the nucleus, they are stable. How does that happen?
I got this from wikipedia:
When bound inside of a nucleus, the instability of a single neutron to beta decay is balanced against the instability that would be acquired by the nucleus as a whole if an additional proton were to participate in repulsive interactions with the other protons that are already present in the nucleus. As such, although free neutrons are unstable, bound neutrons are not necessarily so. The same reasoning explains why protons, which are stable in empty space, may transform into neutrons when bound inside of a nucleus.
But I don't think I get what that really means. What happens inside the nucleus that makes neutrons stable?
Is it the same thing that happens inside a neutron star's core? Because, neutrons seem to be stable in there too.
Best Answer
Spontaneous processes such as neutron decay require that the final state is lower in energy than the initial state. In (stable) nuclei, this is not the case, because the energy you gain from the neutron decay is lower than the energy it costs you to have an additional proton in the core.
For neutron decay in the nuclei to be energetically favorable, the energy gained by the decay must be larger than the energy cost of adding that proton. This generally happens in neutron-rich isotopes:
An example is the $\beta^-$-decay of Cesium: $$\phantom{Cs}^{137}_{55} \mathrm{Cs} \rightarrow \vphantom{Ba}^{137}_{56}\mathrm{Ba} + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$$
For a first impression of the energies involved, you can consult the semi-empirical Bethe-Weizsäcker formula which lets you plug in the number of protons and neutrons and tells you the binding energy of the nucleus. By comparing the energies of two nuclei related via the $\beta^-$-decay you can tell whether or not this process should be possible.