The Schwarzschild metric for $d$ dimensions is the standard form
$$
ds^2~=~-e^{2\phi}dt^2~+~e^{2\gamma}dr^2~+~r^2d\Omega^2
$$
These metric terms in the Einstein field equation gives
$$
R_{tt}~-~\frac{1}{2}Rg_{tt}~=~G_{tt}~=~ -e^{2\phi}\Big((d~-~1)\frac{e^{2\gamma}}{r} ~+~\frac{(d~+~1)(d~-~2)}{2r^2}(1~-~e^{2\gamma}\Big)
$$
A multiplication by $g^{tt}$ removes the $-e^{2\phi}$ and we equate this with a pressureless fluid $T^{tt}~=~\kappa\rho$. So we think of the black hole as composed of “dust.” Some analysis on this is used to compute the $G_r^r$ gives the curvature term
$$
G_r^r~=~\Big((d~-~1)(\phi_{,r}~+~\gamma_{,r})\frac{e^{-2\gamma}}{r}~+~\kappa\rho\Big).
$$
which tells us $\phi~=~-\gamma$, commensurate with the standard Schwarzschild result, and that
$$
e^{-2\gamma}~=~e^{2\phi}~-~\Big(\frac{r_0}{r}\Big)^{d~-~2}.
$$
The entropy of the black hole is then computed by writing the density according to these metric elements and computing the Rindler time coordinates $S~=~2\pi(d~-~2)A/\kappa$.
The results more or less follow as with the standard $3~+~1$ spacetime result. The Connection with strings is to work with the entropy of the black hole. The $1~+~1$ string world sheet has $d~-~1$ transverse degrees of freedom which contain the field data. The entropy $S~=~2\pi(d~-~1)T$ may be computed with the string length, which reduces to the holographic results in $d~=~4$ spacetime.
The event horizon is $d~-~2$ dimensional, which for $10$ dimension means the horizon is $8$ dimensional. The singularity is not considered in these calculations. The factors $e^{-2\gamma}~=~e^{2\phi}$ become extremely large. The metric approximates
$$
ds^2~\simeq~\Big(\frac{r_0}{r}\Big)^{d~-~2}dt^2~+~r^2d\Omega^2
$$
which is a $d~-~1$ dimensional surface where the Weyl curvature diverges for $r~\rightarrow~0$. For $d~=~4$ this has properties similar to an anti-deSitter space.
The theory of black holes essentially follows in arbitrary dimensions. It is interesting to speculate on what the singularity is from a stringy perspective. The event horizon contains the quantum field information which composes the black hole. This may then have some type of correspondence with the interior singularity, with one dimension larger. For a black hole that is very small $\sim~10^3$ Planck units, the horizon is a quantum fluctuating region, as is the singularity, and the QFT data on the two may have some form of equivalency.
Well, the singularity does not concern the differentiable structure: Even around the tip of a cone (including the tip) you can define a smooth differentiable structure (obviously this smooth structure cannot be induced by the natural one in $R^3$ when the cone is viewed as embedded in $R^3$).
Here the singularity is metrical however! Consider a $2D$ smooth manifold an a point $p$, suppose that a smooth metric can be defined in a neighborhood of $p$, including $p$ itself. Next consider a curve $\gamma_r$ surrounding $p$ defined as the set of points with constant geodesic distance $r$ from $p$. Let $L(r)$ be the (metric) length of that curve. It is possible to prove that: $$L(r)/(2\pi r) \to 1\quad \mbox{ as $r \to 0$.}\qquad (1)$$ Actually it is quite evident that this result holds. We say that a $2D$ manifold, equipped with a smooth metric in a neighborhood $A-\{p\}$, of $p$ (notice that now $p$ does not belong to the set where the metric is defined), has a conical singularity in $p$ if:
$$L(r)/(2\pi r) \to a\quad \mbox{ as $r \to 0$,}$$
with $0<a<1$.
Notice that the class of curves $\gamma_r$ can be defined anyway, even if the metric at $p$ is not defined, since the length of curves and geodesics is however defined (as a limit when an endpoint terminates at $p$). Obviously, if there is a conical singularity in $p$, it is not possible to extend the metric of $A-\{p\}$ to $p$, otherwise (1) would hold true and we know that it is false.
As you can understand, all that is independent from the choice of the coordinates you fix around $p$. Nonetheless, polar coordinates are very convenient to perform computations: The fact that they are not defined exactly at $p$ is irrelevant since we are only interested in what happens around $p$ in computing the limits as above.
Yes, removing the point one would get rid of the singularity, but the fact remains that it is impossible to extend the manifold in order to have a metric defined also in the limit point $p$: the metric on the rest of the manifold remembers of the existence of the conical singularity!
The fact that the Lorentzian manifold has no singularities in the Euclidean section and it is periodic in the Euclidean time coordinate has the following physical interpretation in a manifold with a bifurcate Killing horizon generated by a Killig vecotr field $K$. As soon as you introduce a field theory in the Lorentzian section, the smoothness of the manifold and the periodicity in the Euclidean time, implies that the two-point function of the field, computed with respect to the unique Gaussian state invariant under the Killing time and verifying the so called Hadamard condition (that analytically continued into the Euclidean time to get the Euclidean section) verifies a certain condition said the KMS condition with periodicity $\beta = 8\pi M$.
That condition means that the state is thermal and the period of the imaginary time is the constant $\beta$ of the canonical ensemble described by that state (where also the thermodynamical limit has been taken). So that, the associated "statistical mechanics" temperature is: $$T = 1/\beta = 1/8\pi M\:.$$
However the "thermodynamical temperature" $T(x)$ measured at the event $x$ by a thermometer "at rest with" (i.e. whose world line is tangent to) the Killing time in the Lorentzian section has to be corrected by the known Tolman's factor. It takes into account the fact that the perceived temperature is measured with respect to the proper time of the thermometer, whereas the state of the field is in equilibrium with respect to the Killing time. The ratio of the notions of temperatures is the same as the inverse ratio of the two notions of time, and it is encapsulated in the (square root of the magnitude of the) component $g_{00}$ of the metric $$\frac{T}{T(x)}=\frac{dt_{proper}(x)}{dt_{Killing}(x)} = \sqrt{-g_{00}(x)}\:.$$ In an asymptotically flat spacetime, for $r \to +\infty$, it holds $g_{00} \to -1$ so that the "statistical mechanics" temperature $T$ coincides to that measured by the thermometer $T(r=\infty)$ far away from the black hole horizon. This is an answer to your last question.
Best Answer
I think I found a coordinate transformation that shines more light on this. Instead of looking for a conical singularity in $g_{tt}$ alone I must look at conical singularities in any part of the metric (apart from $g_{rr}$) First of all the metric can be expressed in terms of $r_\pm$ and Wick rotated $t\to it_E$ such that $$ ds_{E}^2 = \frac{ (r^2-r_+^2)(r^2+r_-^2)}{l^2r}dt_E^2 + \frac{l^2 r^2}{(r^2-r_+^2)(r^2+r_-^2)} dr^2 + r^2(d\phi + \frac{i r_+ r_-}{l r^2} dt_E)^2 $$ which under the coordinate transformation $$ t'_E = r_+ t_E + r_-\phi, \ \ \ \phi' = r_+ \phi - r_-t_E, \ \ \ r'^2= \frac{r^2-r_+^2}{r_+^2+r_-^2} $$ becomes $$ ds_E^2 = \frac{r'^2}{l^2} dt_E'^2 +\frac{l^2}{1+r'^2} dr'^2 + (1+r'^2)d\phi'^2 $$ which for $r\to r_+$ ($r'\to 0$) becomes $$ ds_E^2 = r'^2 dt_E'^2+dr'^2 +d\phi'^2 $$ which represents flat polar coordinates iff $t_E' \sim t_E' +2\pi$. Furthermore $\phi'$ is not periodic. So the periodicity of $t_E'$ is $\Delta t_E'=2\pi$, and of $\phi'$ is $\Delta \phi'=0$. Combining this yields $$ 2\pi = r_+ \Delta t_E + r_-\Delta \phi, \ \ \ \ 0 = r_+\Delta \phi - r_- \Delta t_E $$ So the time periodicity becomes $\beta =\Delta t_E = \frac{2\pi l r_+}{r_+^2+r_-^2}$ whilst also setting a fixed periodicity for $\phi$. Obviously the Hawking temperature is then $$ T_H = \frac{r_+^2+r_-^2}{2\pi l r_+} $$