This question is about the generalization of Coulomb's law to continuous bodies of charge. The basic statement of Coulomb's Law involves two discrete charges $q_1$ an $q_2$:
$$\vec{F}_i = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r_{12}} \hat{r}_i $$
Here $i$ represents the charge on which the force is exerted, and $\hat{r}_i$ represents the unit displacement vector between the other charge and the charge $i$.
Many treatment of electrostatics extend this law to the case that one charge is not discrete, but rather a continuous body. The force on the discrete charge $Q$ is then:
$$\vec{F} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{dq}{r^2} \hat{r} $$
Here $dq$ is the infinitesimal charge element of the continuous body, while $r$ and $\hat{r}$ represent the distance and displacement vectors between $dq$ and $Q$.
Continuing this way, we could probably propose an expression for force between two continuous bodies of charge, like so:
$$\vec{F} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \int \frac{dq_1 dq_2}{r^2} \hat{r}$$
However, I have not really seen this expression in the literature/treatments of electrostatics. Does anyone know why this is the case? Is the expression not useful, or are there no applications demanding the above expression?
Best Answer
I am not quite sure which literature are you looking for, but it should be written in standard textbook. Anyway, you are right that it is not that useful except a formulation and exercise.
Usually, it is written in the following form. Given a charge distribution $\rho_{1}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}})$ for object with volume $V_1$ and $\rho_{2}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}})$ for object with volume $V_2$, we have the electric field: $$\vec{\mathbf{E}}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int_{V_{1}}\frac{\rho_{1}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}})}{|\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}}-\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}}|^{3}}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}}-\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}})d\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}} \tag{1}$$ and force $$\vec{\mathbf{F}}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int_{V_{2}}\int_{V_{1}}\frac{\rho_{1}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}})\rho_{2}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}})}{|\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}}-\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}}|^{3}}(\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}}-\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}})d\vec{\mathbf{r}_{1}}d\vec{\mathbf{r}_{2}} \tag{2}$$
Because of practicality, it is not used that often: