Quantum Mechanics – Hamiltonian of an Electron in a Magnetic Field

magnetic fieldsmagnetic-momentquantum mechanicsquantum-spinstatistical mechanics

Suppose I have an electron in a magnetic field given by:

$$\vec{B}=B\hat{z}$$

The potential energy of this system is given by:

$$U=-\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{B}=\frac{g\mu_B}{\hbar}\vec{S} \cdot \vec{B}$$

Here, $\vec{\mu}$ is the magnetic moment of the electron, $g$ is the Lande $g$-factor, $\mu_B$ is the Bohr Magneton, and $\vec{S}$ is the spin of the electron.

This shows that from a statistical mechanics perspective, electrons with spin oriented in the direction of the magnetic field have higher energy than the ones with spin antiparallel to $B$. Moreover, magnetic moment and spin point in the opposite directions.

Anyway, when solving, we simply note that:

$$\vec{S}\cdot\vec{B}=\hat{S_3} B_z$$

Since the electrons are either in $|\uparrow\rangle$ or in the $|\downarrow\rangle$ state, the expectation value of this is nothing but the eigenvalues corresponding to these states, i.e. $\frac{\hbar}{2}$ and $-\frac{\hbar}{2}$ respectively.

This is how we obtain the energy for parallel and antiparallel configurations of the spin and the magnetic field.

From what I understand, till now, we were basically finding the expectation value of $\hat{U}$ for parallel and antiparallel spins.

In general, we should have,

$$\hat{U}=\frac{g\mu_B}{\hbar}\vec{S} \cdot \vec{B}=\frac{g\mu_B}{\hbar}\frac{\hbar}{2}\vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{B}\approx\mu_B\space\hat{\sigma_3}{B_z}$$

To obtain the energy of the parallel configuration, we would take $\langle\uparrow |\hat{U}|\uparrow\rangle$.

Similarly, we can obtain an expression for the antiparallel configuration.

My question is, whether:

$$\hat{U}=+\mu_B\space \hat{\sigma_3} B_z$$

or is it:

$$\hat{U}=-\mu_B\space \hat{\sigma_3} B_z \ \ \ ?$$

Since magnetic moment and angular momentum should be in the opposite direction for negatively charged particles, I believe it should be the former. Wikipedia agrees with this viewpoint.

However, in many texts on quantum statistical mechanics, like Pathria for example, the latter is said to be true.

Can someone point out which one of the two expressions is correct?

Best Answer

For spin 1/2 fermions

\begin{equation} \boldsymbol S = \frac{\hbar}{2}\boldsymbol\sigma \end{equation}

where $\boldsymbol\sigma$ is a vector of the three Pauli matrices $(\sigma_x, \sigma_{y}, \sigma_z).$ Furthermore $\boldsymbol \mu = -\frac{g_{S}\mu_{B}}{\hbar} \boldsymbol S$, where the spin g-factor of an electron is approximately 2. For $\boldsymbol B = (0, 0, B_{z})$ your Hamiltonian is given by

\begin{equation} H = \mu_{B}B_{z}\sigma_{z} \end{equation}

Note that the sign has changed because the charge of the electron is negative. This means electrons and protons actually behave in opposite manners in magnetic fields, i.e. they have opposite magnetic moments.

The two Zeeman Hamiltonians you have written are equivalent up to a unitary transformation $UHU^{-1} = -H$ where $U=\sigma_{x}$. This essentially amounts to a relabelling of the spin components ( $\uparrow \rightarrow \downarrow$ and vice-versa).