Does a tower bell ringing prevent thunderstorms

acousticsfluid dynamicslightningmeteorologywaves

Introduction

This is the beginning of an apparently physics-unrelated question which involves 1700-1800 Italian law, atmospheric processes, sound waves propagating through fluids, and lightning strikes burning down churches.

The core of the question is figuring out if and how a sound wave influences the formation / disruption of clouds and eventual thunderstorms.

Background and Context

I live next to the European Alps, in northern Italy. Here weather is often cloudy and thunderstorms are not rare. For religious purposes, every town in this area has a church, with a tall bell tower alongside it. And of course, a huge bronze bell hangs in each tower ringing every hour.

I've talked to a local elderly (who happens to manage the bell tower) about thunderstorms, and I was told that every time a thunderstorm approaches, he rings the bell repeatedly and vigorously to try to "break up the storm" and "tear the clouds apart", in order to supposedly avoid rain and thunder falling on the town. This is a practice still widely used to this day in this area. Me being a engineering student, I wanted to figure out if that really made sense and what effects ringing the bell really had.

Question formalization

A bronze bell ringing multiple times produces sound. The kinetic energy of the bronze clapper is cast on the bell, which converts it into vibrations.
Specifically, the bronze bell vibrates and transfers the sharp vibration to the layer of air molecules wrapped around the bell, which initiates a chain transmission. This produces sound waves, which are longitudinal (compression) waves transmitted through a fluid (air).

Longitudinal waves are waves in which the vibration of the medium is
parallel ("along") to the direction the wave travels and displacement
of the medium is in the same (or opposite) direction of the wave
propagation. Mechanical longitudinal waves are also called
compressional or compression waves, because they produce compression
and rarefaction when traveling through a medium, and pressure waves,
because they produce increases and decreases in pressure. [source]

compression waves through a fluid

Those waves are then spread out more or less spherically (inverse square law) from the bell top point.

The natural questions to ask at this point are:

  • What happens when the sound wave passes through the cloud?
  • Does the wave have enough energy to reasonably alter the formation of the cloud and therefore alter / prevent the thunderstorm?
  • Is there such thing as "breaking up the storm", or is it just a popular belief/psychological effect?

I genuinely have no idea since I have no first hand experience with this, even though it sounds almost insane.
Thunderstorm formation looks like a process on a whole different scale, but I can't seem to find a connection with sound waves.

Thunderstorms form when warm, moist air rises into cold air. The warm
air becomes cooler, which causes moisture, called water vapor, to form
small water droplets – a process called condensation. The cooled air
drops lower in the atmosphere, warms and rises again. [source]

Historically relevant experiments

While doing my research I found papers from the late 1700s where Italian scientist were trying to answer one of our questions: does ringing the tower bell disrupt an incoming thunderstorm?

Their answer is the opposite of what I expected: they thought that ringing the bell actually amplified the storm.

You can find the original version of these papers here

Their results look extremely non rigorous, but it can be a starting point to reflect on.

Note: I can do a full translation of the paper if someone is interested, right now I'll do my best to translate and summarize the key concepts (sparing you a ton of mid-1700 religious and legal drama)

Paper published in 1770

Key: Total nonsense

The vibration induced by the bell sharp sound has 2 effects on air: it
rubs together different parts [of the cloud] and it thins out the mass
[of the cloud]. The rubbing, as it is known, awakens the "electric
fire" (I have no clue about what that is). The thinning out attracts
it [the electric fire], diminishing air resistence. Vibrations in
general unite instead of breaking up.

It is also said that the bell sound (while storming) attracts the lightning strikes on the tower bell (which is pure nonsense), instead of letting lightning target houses or fields, and it is thought to be a good thing.

Plus, the bell sound would warn locals that a storm is approaching, which is said to be a nice side effect, but actually feels like it's the most relevant thing.

Act of 1783

Key: Law prohibits ringing bells during storms

A series of sad experiences says that the tower bell ring, instead of
dissipating the clouds and the storms, activates and puts in danger
the towers and the churches, which have been subject to numerous
strikes, fires and deaths during storms. It is therefore prohibited to
ring bells during storms.

Paper published in 1787:

Key: Evaluation of air vibration effects on clouds

This paper exposes 2 reasons backing up the law against ringing bells during storms.

1: Atmospheric Sound Ondulations.
Vibrations originated from
percussion of objects propagate spherically, generating "compression
and approachment of parts". Not heavy clouds break under this
condition. But a cloud is a electrified conductor. It is known that
the stress exercised from the electric fire is inversely proportional
to its capacity, and its capacity is directly proportional to the
surface area. If the cloud volume decreases, its surface area must
decrease too. Therefore, the capacity will decrease and the intensity
of the electric fire will increase. From this we can infer that
vibrations, which compress the volume of a cloud, necessarily increase
the intensity of the electric fire, which will discharge on the
closest bodies, thus on the bell tower.

2: Air rarity around bell tower. Vibrations continuously remove air and turn it into thinner and thinner air. There is therefore an
air current towards the sound source. The electric fire will follow
that direction.

It ends with:

It is demonstrated that ringing the bell promotes the striking of a lightning and targets the strike on the source of the vibrations.

enter image description here

Best Answer

There is enormous energy in a storm, which will be randomly oriented with respect to a bell tower.

The energy in the bell's sound will be radially falling with $1/r^2$ and is not directional. The energy that a man can input to the bell ringing is limited.

The physics answer must be: there is no connection.

Then the question becomes metaphysics, the bell ringing raises the religious impulses of people to diffuse the storm. Are prayers effective? Uneducated religious people in general seem to believe so. Physics has not reached the level of detecting whether there is anything in metaphysics, (from telepathy to, in this case, manipulating storms)

Taking the expectation of bell ringing to defuse storms as a metaphsyics experiment, the answer seems to be "prayers are not effective"

Churches and castles were often extremely dangerous buildings during thunderstorms in the days before the lightning rod was invented. Being so tall, they were highly vulnerable to lightning strikes: hundreds of bell-ringers across Europe were killed over the centuries in the mistaken belief that ringing the bells would ward off lightning. But an even greater hazard was the habit of storing gunpowder in castles and church vaults.

Related Question