% NARXnet non-integer delays problem
I am not a statistician. Therefore, if you need the explanation to be precise, find a statistics text or reference. For example, search using Wikipedia and/or Google using the term "significant correlations".
At certain lags the magnitude of the correlation between two time functions exceeds that expected from two uncorrelated functions.
To quantify the concept, estimate the cumulative probability of the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between two independent Gaussian noise samples of length N. Choose a significant probability level, e.g., 95%. and the corresponding correlation value sigthresh95. This threshold value depends on N.
The absolute value of the correlation coefficient, at lag m, between two time functions of length N ls considered significant if it is greater or equal to sigthresh95. The lag values for which this occurrs are called significant lags.
For time-series prediction I just use trial and error to choose a subset of the smaller significant lags. However, there are more exact selection methods using "partial correlations". See a stats reference for more detail.
I'm not sure if the following command line references will help:
>> lookfor 'partial correlation'
partialcorr - Linear or rank partial correlation coefficients.
partialcorri - Partial correlation coefficients with internal adjustments.
Use the help and doc commands for details.
I have no idea. It could stand for the 35th value in the cumulative probability ditribution.
As I said previously, I just choose a subset using trial and error.
Incorrect value for N = 1500
Incorrect. You are confusing correlation values and delay values
Hope this helps.
Thank you for formally acepting my answer
Greg
Best Answer