Dear all,
I did histograms of :
1. whole image2. image masked 3. image with inverted masked
I would expect sum of counts in 2+3 shall be same as in 1. But it is not. So is this because of the mask line width (I do masking with imfreehand).. and double assigning of some pixels to masked and reversed masked region?, or is my procedure somehow wrong. Scheme is as follows
masked_image=whole_image.*mask;inverse_masked_image=whole_image.*(~mask)
the numbers differ like 1=65536, and(2+3)=78086..
thanks!
Best Answer