Why do I get unexpected results when using the NORMXCORR2 function?
For example, I can create a pair of images of a black cross on a light background, and NORMXCORR2 will detect the shift between the two images in the first case (cross is 18 pixels wide). But when I widen the cross (to 38 pixels) NORMXCORR2 indicates that there has not been a shift
between the two images. It is clear that there is a shift from a visual examination of the images. Is there a bug?
Best Answer