MATLAB: Both primal and dual problems are infeasible

errorinfeasiblelinprog

I want to solve a linear optimisation problem in MatLab. But i see an error message :
Exiting: One or more of the residuals, duality gap, or
total relative error has stalled: both the primal and the dual appear to be infeasible.
My equation :
z=150*x9 + 150*x10 + 305*x11 + 100*x12 (min)
Limits :
2.5*x1 - 2.5*x2 <=1;
1.67*x1 - 1.67*x4 <=0.8;
5*x1 - 5*x5 <=1;
5*x2 - 5*x3<=1;
2.5*x2 - 2.5*x4 <=1;
5*x3 - 5*x5 <=1;
x6<=0.5;
x7<=1.65;
x8<=5.45.
Constrain:
-9.17*x1 + 2.5*x2 + 1.67*x4 + 5*x5 + x6 = 0.8;
2.5*x1 - 10*x2 + 5*x3 +2.5*x4 + x9 -x13= 2.4;
5*x2 - 10*x3 +5*x5 + x7 -x12 +x16 = 0.4;
1.67*x1 + 2.5*x2 - 4.17*x4 + x10 -x14 =1.6;
5*x1 + 5*x3 - 10*x5 + x11 + x12 - x15 -x16 =2.4;
x8 - x9 - x10 - x11 + x13 + x14+ x15 = 0.
My code in MatLab :
c=[0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;150;150;305;100;0;0;0;0;];
A = [-9.17,2.5,0,1.67,5,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
2.5,-10,5,2.5,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,0,0,0;
0,5,-10,0,5,0,1,0,0,0,0,-1,0,0,0,1;
1.67,2.5,0,-4.17,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,-1,0,0;
5,0,5,0,-10,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,-1,-1;
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,-1,-1,-1,0,1,1,1,0;
2.5,-2.5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
1.67,0,0,-1.67,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
5,0,0,0,-5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,5,-5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,2.5,0,-2.5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,0,5,0,-5,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
];
b = [0.8;2.4;0.4;1.6;2.4;0;1;0.8;1;1;1;1;0.5;1.65;5.45;];
[x,fval] = linprog(f,A,b)
I think, everything is true but software say to me there was an error!
Please someone help me for this subject…

Best Answer

I think, everything is true but software say to me there was an error!
MATLAB isn't reporting an error, only that a solution does not exist.
It can be verified that the dual of your problem is infeasible, as the message reports. This means that your original problem has no solution. The constraints of the dual problem are,
A.'*y=-c,
y>=0
The 8th constraint in the above is y(6)+y(16)=0. Because y>=0, this means that both y(6)=0 and y(16)=0. Since y(6)=0, the 9th constraint above reduces to y(2)=-150, which conflicts with y>=0.