There are a lot of very complicated expression that helps us obtain useful estimates for PDEs. To just give one example, the following is one of the Virial identities:
$$
\frac12\frac{d}{dt} \Im \left(\int (x \cdot \nabla u) u^* \right)dx =\int|\nabla u|^2 dx -\epsilon\left(\frac{n}{2}-\frac{n}{p+1}\right)\int|u|^{p+1} dx,
$$
where $u\in H^1, xu\in L^2$ solves the non-linear Schrödinger equation $i\partial_t u + \Delta u = -\epsilon u|u|^2$ in $\mathbb R^n.$
One way to come up with complicated "energy" or "momentum" expressions is to use Noether's theorem, but apparently many identities similar to the one above cannot be easily derived by Noether's theorem. In particular, the above expression can be derived without using any Lagrangians at all.
I often see such complicated identities in texts about PDE theory, stated and proven without any clues about where they come from.
My question is: how do people come up with them in the first place? It would be very helpful if there were an explanation for at least one or two identities like this so that I can see what type of reasoning is involved when we discover them.
Best Answer
In addition to the variational approach based on Noether's theorem, there are other ways to find conservation laws for nonlinear PDE's:
So yes, there are alternatives to just "mucking around until you see something".