[Math] Is it usual for a referee to heed updated versions on arxiv

arxivjournalssoft-question

I've put a paper on arxiv one year ago and I've submitted the version 6 to a journal seven months ago.

During these last seven months, I've given several talks about this work, which led me to update again the paper on arxiv, to fix some typos, polish, add clarification, add a few new applications and questions… nothing very serious, but the last arxiv version (of 51 pages) is surely better than the submitted one (of 47 pages).

Out of respect for the work of the referee and to not delay the report, I believe (perhaps wrongly) that it is better to not update the submission before the first report; but I was wondering:

Question: Is it usual for a referee to heed updated versions on arxiv?

Best Answer

I think Friedrich Knop's answer describes a beautiful ideal, but it is not very realistic. For example, the following have both happened to me personally:

  1. I posted a preliminary version of a paper to the arXiv; later, after completing the paper and improving the results, I submitted the completed paper to a journal without updating the arXiv version. When I received the referee report, it was clear that the referee downloaded the version from the arXiv rather than reading the submitted version (they complain about the presence of hypotheses that don't appear in the paper I submitted, and refer to propositions with the numbering from the arXiv version). Milder versions of this story have happened with other papers.

  2. For another paper, I posted to the arXiv and submitted to a journal at the same time. Many months went by without a referee report. At some point I updated the version on the arXiv to reflect some minor corrections. When I received the report, the referee points out that some of their suggestions for changes to the paper have already been implemented in the more-recent arXiv revision.

In light of the first story, whenever I submit a paper, I now always make a point to update the arXiv version to be at least as current as the submitted version. In theory, perhaps this should not be necessary; but referees are human, and like everyone they sometimes take shortcuts.

Related Question